|
|
|
Uploaded: Monday, October 19, 2009, 5:37 PM
Victim 'afraid' for safety, weeks before fire
Court records show victim, boyfriend had restraining order againt two brothers
|
|
by Gennady Sheyner
Palo Alto Online Staff
Jennifer Schipsi, the 29-year-old real-estate agent whose body was found in a burning house on Addison Avenue last week, reported she was facing threats from two brothers in the weeks leading up to her death, court documents show.
Schipsi, an agent in the Palo Alto branch of Alain Pinel Realtors, moved from San Jose to Palo Alto a little over a month ago and was living at 969 Addison Ave. with her boyfriend, Paul Zumot, 36. Her burned body was found in the bedroom of the one-story home shortly after neighbors and firefighters doused the flames on the evening of Oct. 15.
Palo Alto police wouldn't comment on whether Schipsi died under suspicious circumstances and would not identify her as the victim Monday. But in court records, she alleged that she and Zumot were recently threatened by brothers Tony Ghanma, 46, and Hisham Ghanma, 42.
According to a restraining order application Schipsi filed on Sept. 19 with the Santa Clara County Superior Court, she was worried about both her and Zumot's safety just weeks before their house burned down. [Note: The application for a temporary restraining order was denied and a hearing was scheduled for early October, but was postponed because the brothers were not served, according to their attorney, Robert Cummings of Redwood City. The brothers contest the allegations in the application, he said.
Schipsi knew both brothers through Zumot, who according to her declaration was once close friends with Hisham Ghanma. But Zumot and the Ghanmas appeared to have a falling out after Zumot witnessed Tony Ghanma kissing Schipsi on the lips. Zumot allegedly became angry and went to talk to Hisham about the incidence. That's when, according to Schipsi's declaration, "this whole thing got stirred up."
"This case is not about the kiss anymore," Schipsi wrote in her declaration. "It's about my safety and the safety of Mr. Zumot.
"I am now afraid for Mr. Zumot's safety and my own. I am afraid because what they are doing, by going after Mr. Zumot, is so wrong. I now think that they will do anything to prevail."
According to the declaration, the two brothers allegedly offered Schipsi $5,000 to testify against Zumot and offered to help move her out of Zumot's house. They also told Schipsi that Zumot was a liar who was seeing other women.
The brothers also allegedly threatened to "take care of" Zumot, which Schipsi interpreted as a threat to kill him. She wrote that she had seen Hisham Ghanma display a shotgun during a camping trip to Lake Comanche that she, Zumot, Hisham's family and one of Ghanma's employees took in early July of this year.
"I have seen Hisham Ghanma with a firearm," Schipsi wrote in a declaration supporting Zumot's request for a restraining order against the two brothers. "I am worried he has ignored a Court Order that he turn it in.
"He could be armed and I want to confirm that he is not ignoring the Court Order and he is no longer in possession of a firearm."
She also stated that Hisham Ghanma had threatened her directly and wrote that she was "afraid of what Tony Ghanma might do."
She reported in an Oct. 1 request for orders to stop harassment against Hisham Ghama that as recently as Sept. 24 she received a life-threatening phone call from Ghanma's cell phone.
"I have been getting many phone calls from blocked numbers," she wrote. "I cannot sleep and have been very stressful (sic)."
Paul Zumot could not be reached Monday afternoon. His attorney, John Perrott from the San Jose-based firm Thomas Chase Stutzman, said he would not comment on any of the cases involving Zumot unless he received his client's permission.
But court records show that Zumot and Schipsi themselves were involved in a series of heated arguments in February 2008, arguments that prompted Schipsi to apply for a restraining order against Zumot, whom she started dating in October 2007.
On March 20, 2008, Schipsi filed a declaration with the Santa Clara County Superior Court accusing Zumot of throwing objects at her, kicking her car door, shouting obscenities at her on the street and spitting in her face. On Feb. 7, according to her declaration, Zumot grabbed her arm so tightly that it was "sore for several days" and screamed profanities at her for 10 minutes.
She also filed a police report on March 17, saying she does not feel safe with Zumot.
"This man drives (by) my house every day," she wrote. "I keep my curtains closed and do not answer my door. I need him to leave me alone."
She also stated that she "noticed signs of extreme anger and controlling characteristics" as they dated. She said she had been sleeping over at a friend's house to avoid seeing Zumot.
One e-mail allegedly from Zumot, which Schipsi submitted to the court in March 2008, reads: "Even though I did the ugliest thing ever to u, but I am gonna win u back at any cost. You will be my wife some day, mark my word."
But their feud appeared to have cooled by the end of the year. In October 2008, Schipsi asked the court to reduce her restraining order to "peaceful conduct" and to delete the "stay-away order," attributing her earlier filing to a "misunderstanding."
On Monday, the couple's landlord John Eckland described Schipsi and Zumot as "very private" people and described Schipsi's personality as "friendly" and "pleasant." Eckland, whose house stands behind the burned building, said he hadn't seen Schipsi since Sunday, Oct. 11, four days before the fire. Her vehicle, he said, hadn't been parked in the driveway throughout the week leading up to the fire.
Eckland said he was getting ready to have dinner with his father, Herb, and three friends at about 6:30 p.m. last Thursday when a man who was walking a dog knocked on the door and said the house in front of Eckland's is burning. Another person who was driving by the fire also banged on Eckland's door to report the fire, said Herb Eckland.
John Eckland and a friend then went into the burning building and used garden hoses to dowse the flames. Firefighters then arrived to extinguish what was left of the fire, containing it to the bedroom.
Eckland said Schipsi and Zumot seemed like a happy couple. He said the two seemed to really like their new home on Addison Avenue, between Fife and Channing avenues.
"They found their place," Eckland said.
On Monday, the house was surrounded with caution tape. A charred box spring from the burned bedroom leaned against the fence on the driveway. Several flower bouquets stood near the front of the house, in memory of the victim.
Eckland said he and his friend had no idea, when they went into the bedroom to battle the flames, that there was an occupant in the bedroom. They didn't learn about Schipsi's death until Friday.
"We didn't know there was someone in there until the following day, when police called and said, 'We found the remains of a human being,'" Eckland said.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by YSK, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Oct 19, 2009 at 6:22 pm Seems pretty cut and dried to me. Hope they find proof.
|
|
Posted by Jim, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Oct 19, 2009 at 7:05 pm What a mess.
|
|
Posted by Outside Observer, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Oct 19, 2009 at 7:56 pm It doesn't seem "cut and dry" at all to me. To many unanswered questions, nor do I consider a restraining order definitive proof of anything.
Yes, a tragedy that the young lady is dead, but I'm quite sure we haven't heard the end of the story.
|
|
Posted by John, a resident of the Meadow Park neighborhood, on Oct 19, 2009 at 8:16 pm The same story, different town. Abusive boyfriend, but "I love him." "He's changed"
Girl ends up dead.
|
|
Posted by Boyfriend arrested, a resident of East Palo Alto, on Oct 19, 2009 at 8:25 pm Yep, ya gotta wonder, since he was pointing the finger at the other 2, how they would've gotten into the house.
|
|
Posted by friend of victim, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Oct 20, 2009 at 5:52 am thank you palo alto pd for doing your job and getting this guy off the street in a timely fashion! [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.] RIP Jennifer you will live on in our hearts.
|
|
Posted by Houka, a resident of another community, on Oct 20, 2009 at 7:53 am Memo to young women. Don't ever think that you can change dirtbags into princes.
|
|
Posted by A Noun Ea Mus, a resident of the Professorville neighborhood, on Oct 20, 2009 at 8:45 am Put yourself in the place of Zumot's defense attorney.
If there is presented an abundance of physical and circumstantial evidence I imagine you'd be looking to plea bargain.
If not, wouldn't the attorney be a bit underserving his client not to point as big a finger as could be towards the Ghanma's? (Note correct use of the word "under served").
"Ghanma, what a big restraining order you have"
"The better to elicit a hung jury my dear"
|
|
Posted by Don't Be Lazy, a resident of another community, on Oct 21, 2009 at 2:27 pm What is amazing to me is how quickly people want to take a few pieces of information out of their context, string them together circumstantially and go with the easiest story to explain a tragedy and convict a guy because "they have seen that story before". This isn't some CSI show with the typical story line. These are real people with real lives.
There are so many holes of missing information to create far more than a reasonable doubt. She got back with a guy she allegedly thought was abusive (or had to say that to get the restraining order which she removes) and he allegedly gets back with a girl who cheated on him. Does any of this necessarily mean Zumot did it? No! At best it means they were both either messed up people or actually people that knew how to forgive each other. At worst, they are both unstable people. The truth is probably somewhere in between.
It is a tragedy a human being lost their life. It is an even bigger tragedy to cost another human being their life because of lazy investigative work that prefers the easy, better looking explanation succumbing to public opinion based on missing information than actually getting at the truth with HARD EVIDENCE and not circumstantial stuff.
IF the guy did it, then by all means let justice be served. If he didn't, then by all means let it be justice that he is released. But whatever, don't let it be that we want to wrongfully convict a man out of emotion under the guise of "justice". What this case needs is an inspector 'Monk' to get at the real truth.
|
|
Posted by tGhanma, a resident of another community, on Oct 21, 2009 at 3:14 pm On behalf of the Ghanma family, Tony and Hisham would like to express
their deepest and most heartfelt sorrow to the family and friends of
Jennifer Schipsi. They genuinely loved Jennifer for the warm and
wonderful person that she was and considered her a friend. Their thoughts and prayers are with her family during this horrible tragedy. At this time, to preserve the integrity of the investigation and ongoing prosecution of Bulos Zumot, the Ghanma’s do not wish to release any further information.
The Ghanma family would like to thank the Palo Alto Police Department for the respect afforded to them during their thorough investigation of this matter and express their appreciation for their swift efforts in pursuing justice.
|
|
Posted by midtowwnmom, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Oct 21, 2009 at 4:19 pm @ Don't be lazy
This forum is not a court of law, right? We're not the eventual jury obviously. We're free to read all the material that's been published so far and also realize that much, much more information has not been released at this time. As many have stated already, the truth will come out in a court of law but in the meantime, we're free to discuss the info we have so far, and that's all most are doing. Time to come down off your high horse and stop assuming we're dunces!
|
|
Posted by hmmmmm, a resident of the The Greenhouse neighborhood, on Oct 21, 2009 at 7:04 pm Why would Mr Ghanma Feel Compelled to write a post on this site... I am not accusing any one but i would look into this further if i were the cops..... A Guilty Conscious eats you alive.... Again Lets all not Point Fingers at anyone but at the same time let justice rule on this.... Only in time we will know the full story will unravel.
|
|
Posted by As if, a resident of another community, on Oct 21, 2009 at 9:14 pm Why r u even commenting on this . He is compelled ???
Wow
All of the sudden this web site is for people that are not involved in this issue???
Come on now. If he felt that he needs to make a statement then he has every right to do so. What gives u the right to comment??? And ur not even part of this case. And dont u think that the cops read or get all of these comments???
He is speakin to her friends and family. Maybe he feels guilty that he didnt save jenny from her abusive boyfriend and that he couldve done something but wasnt able to
|
|
Posted by Seriously, a resident of another community, on Oct 23, 2009 at 7:32 pm [Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]
|
|
Comments on this topic have been limited to registered users who are logged in.
If you are a registered user, login here.
If not, registration is very simple and may be done here. | |

2007 Awards from the California
Newspaper Publishers Association
Palo Alto Weekly
First Place
Local News Coverage
Local Breaking-News Story
Feature Story
Second Place
Feature Story
Environmental Reporting
Sports Coverage
General News Photo
Photo Essay
Freedom of Information
The Almanac
First Place
Environmental Reporting
Editorial Pages
Lifestyle Coverage
Second Place
Environmental Reporting
Mountain View Voice
Second Place
General Excellence
Editorial Comment
Front-Page Design
|
|
|