|
|
|
Uploaded: Friday, October 2, 2009, 11:46 AM
Opening doors to the City Council?
Diverse candidates compete for five open seats on Palo Alto council
|
|
by Gennady Sheyner
Palo Alto Weekly Staff
Photo
 | Fourteen candidates -- four lawyers, two Realtors, two school volunteers, three consultants, a retired property manager, a concert promoter and a panhandler -- are vying for five open seats on the nine-member Palo Alto City Council this fall.
After Election Day on Nov. 3, at least four (possibly five) candidates will be elected to the council for the first time. Aside from incumbent Councilman Larry Klein, who has spent 12 years on the council, including eight in the 1980s, none of the candidates have served on the city's top legislative body before.
And only one other (Karen Holman) has taken what used to be the traditional route to the council -- prior service on other city boards and commissions.
Yet the field this year has a wealth of volunteers with experience in community organizations and the school district, including one former school-board member, Gail Price.
The candidates are vying for Klein's seat as well as those of Mayor Peter Drekmeier, Vice Mayor Jack Morton, and council members John Barton and Yoriko Kishimoto. Morton and Kishimoto will reach their term limits at the end of this year, while Drekmeier and Barton have opted not to seek second terms.
Over the past three months or so, the candidates -- Klein, Corey Levens, John Hackmann, Greg Scharff, Leon Leong, Dan Dykwel, Price, Nancy Shepherd, Holman, Brian Steen, Tim Gray, Christopher Gaither, Mark Weiss and Victor Frost -- have been soliciting signatures, shaking hands and explaining their positions at forums, in questionnaires and during street encounters. (View a map of where the candidates live in Palo Alto).
They have interviewed at local newspapers and, in some cases, attended council meetings to talk on issues about which they're particularly passionate.
The winners will face a city impacted by regional issues as well as home-town concerns:
* a projected $10 million gap in the city budget;
* the proposed high-speed rail line;
* a composting operation that will soon be displaced;
* the massive expansion of Stanford Hospitals and Clinics;
* ongoing concern over the emotional and mental health of the community's teenagers;
* a stalled effort to give the Palo Alto Police Department bigger headquarters;
* continuing concerns over traffic and high-density housing; and more.
Over the next two weeks, Palo Alto Online will post brief profiles of all 14 candidates for Palo Alto City Council, which are featured in random order. In addition, video interviews of the candidates will be posted next week.
Here is the first of a two-part series.
■ Brian Steen
■ Mark Weiss
■ Leon Leong
■ Larry Klein
■ Dan Dykwel
■ Nancy Shepherd
■ Chris Gaither
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by Melanie Kimbel, a resident of Mountain View, on Oct 2, 2009 at 10:00 pm I'd vote for Brian Steen in a minute! Brian distinguishes himself from the others in this group in several ways. He's the only candidate that has had a career in preserving and protecting our precious environment. In addition, Brian has worked diligently for many months with leaders and agencies up and down the peninsula on the High Speed Rail in order to ensure that Palo Alto feels the least impact possible. Palo Alto is a model city, one that the rest of the country looks to for innovation and leadership. Brian stands ready to listen, collaborate and lead in a manner that will honor the folks who live here.
|
|
Posted by Sun and Sand, a resident of the Duveneck/St. Francis neighborhood, on Oct 3, 2009 at 3:25 pm "Palo Alto is a model city, one that the rest of the country looks to for innovation and leadership."
Here's a world-wide list - Palo Alto isn't on it
Web Link
Show me a list, or someone of authority that says this (outside of Palo Alto).
Palo Alto *was* an influential city some years ago; we have become quite staid. It's still a good place to live, with wonderful benefits, but "leadership in municipal operations" and stuff like that is a self-serving local myth.
It's that kind of self-satisfied thinking that leads us all down the primrose path to stagnation, which is just about where we are, now.
See my last post on Paul Losch's Community Blog for one suggestion to change all that - or at least make a start that isn't mucked up by returning to the same-old, same-old governance model.
I think the structural changes that we're into now are going to have to hit home a bit harder - maybe one or two more election cycles, and then people will be motivated enough to look into changing our governance model, among other things, before we see real change.
|
|
Posted by huh?, a resident of the Crescent Park neighborhood, on Oct 3, 2009 at 8:33 pm "Here's a world-wide list - Palo Alto isn't on it"
You do understand there is a variance in the definition of "city"?
|
|
|
| |

2007 Awards from the California
Newspaper Publishers Association
Palo Alto Weekly
First Place
Local News Coverage
Local Breaking-News Story
Feature Story
Second Place
Feature Story
Environmental Reporting
Sports Coverage
General News Photo
Photo Essay
Freedom of Information
The Almanac
First Place
Environmental Reporting
Editorial Pages
Lifestyle Coverage
Second Place
Environmental Reporting
Mountain View Voice
Second Place
General Excellence
Editorial Comment
Front-Page Design
|
|
|