|
|
|
Uploaded: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 9:45 PM
Federal funds unlikely for Palo Alto fiber project
City to work on a business plan to improve city's broadband service
|
|
by Gennady Sheyner
Palo Alto Online Staff
Palo Alto's long and tangled trek toward a citywide, high-speed broadband network is unlikely to attract federal aid in the near future and would likely require a major injection of local funds, city officials said Monday night.
City officials have been hoping to get about $8.8 million in federal stimulus funds for a citywide wireless network and an expansion of Palo Alto's existing fiber-optics backbone. But earlier this month, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration -- which is charged with distributing $4.7 billion for broadband projects -- released funding guidelines that essentially guarantee Palo Alto wouldn't be selected.
Joe Saccio, Palo Alto's deputy director of administrative services, said the department will now work on a business plan to identify the various options the city has for boosting the city's broadband network and funding the necessary infrastructure. Palo Alto will also keep an eye out for changes in the federal guidelines -- changes that could make the city eligible for future rounds of grants.
Saccio said city officials had hoped the federal government would consider economic growth and improved public safety among its criteria for grant eligibility and tailored its proposal accordingly. But earlier this month, Palo Alto learned that the federal grants would be generally limited to communities with little or no Internet access -- a caveat that all but disqualifies Palo Alto.
"Palo Alto is very, very, very unlikely to be one of those areas," Saccio told the council Monday. "In fact, we believe we're ineligible to apply."
Given the new information about the federal guidelines, Palo Alto officials opted not to apply for the first round of federal grants but rather to wait until the second and third rounds. The next round is scheduled for September.
The latest impediment may not, however, deter the city from pursuing its long-held dream of a citywide broadband project, which could include a wireless network, an expanded fiber backbone or both. Palo Alto has spent more than a decade looking for ways to expand its fiber-optics infrastructure to city residents. The latest effort was aborted in March, after a consortium of telecommunications firms with which the city was negotiating lost an investor and pulled out of discussions.
The council had consistently called for a "Fiber to the Premise" plan that would use the city's fiber-optic network as leverage and require little or no expenditure from the city's general fund. In recent months, however, city officials have begun to contemplate a wireless network that would complement the much more powerful fiber system and that could help the city reel in federal funds.
Staff estimated the hybrid system (and the initial expansion of the fiber network to city neighborhoods) to cost about $8.8 million.
So far, the city's wireless plan has been greeted with a mixed reaction from the community. An advisory group formed to explore a new broadband system urged city officials to instead focus on expanding the fiber backbone to commercial areas -- a plan that could bring in fresh revenue to the city's $7 million Fiber Optics Fund.
Resident Jeff Hoel also cautioned the council that pursuing wireless could take the city's eyes off the greater prize -- the long-awaited fiber system.
But Karl Garcia, co-founder of the company Silicon Valley Unwired, said fiber and wireless don't have to be mutually exclusive. Garcia, who helped design and build a wireless network in Mountain View, said Palo Alto would greatly benefit from a similar system.
Though the wireless system wouldn't come close to matching fiber's ability to provide broadband service at 100 megabits per second, it would provide users with other benefits -– namely, the ability to use their laptops, PDAs and other mobile devices anywhere in the city.
"That 100 megabit connection is useless to me when I'm walking out my front door," Garcia said. "Fiber and wireless networks solve different problems and both are important."
The council agreed that a business plan is in order. But council members split on what road the city should pursue next. Councilwoman Yoriko Kishimoto said she was enthusiastic about staff's plan to provide city residents with wireless service, while Councilman Greg Schmid sided with the advisory board and advocated extending fiber to the commercial districts, even if the city has to build it without federal funds.
Councilman Pat Burt, meanwhile, suggested that the council let the city's newly expanded Utilities Advisory Commission explore this complex topic and issue its own recommendation.
"Frankly, in this town, people who are world-class business people in telecommunications and information technology are residing on every block," Burt said.
The council is expected to resume the discussion in September, when staff is scheduled to return with a business plan.
|
|
| Comments
|
Posted by PAmoderate, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 7:24 am In other news, the sky continues to be blue. What a waste of time.
|
|
Posted by SteveU, a resident of the Barron Park neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 9:14 am SteveU is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online Another project that only made sense because Federal Money was being spent.
We have basic infrastructure deteriorating faster than it is being maintained. That looks like a great place to spend money that is burning a hole in the councils shallow pocket.
|
|
Posted by resident, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 11:00 am Go figure, all the stimulus money went to Goldman Sachs! LOL! Oh, you didn't hear that they're paying record bonuses when just months ago they received billions in bailout funds? Sorry Palo Alto, you lose!
|
|
Posted by MEA, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 11:01 am It's actually amazing that the Federal Government saw through this ruse. It actually makes me feel better that they are protecting the taxpayers from cities such as Palo Alto who leaped at the opportunity for free money to support programs that even the community wasn't willing to support with their own dollars.
|
|
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 12:30 pm Walter_E_Wallis is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online The dems know they have Paly anyway, so they use the money to buy less certain votes.
|
|
Posted by Toady, a resident of the Greenmeadow neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 2:56 pm Yep, which is why they're fleecing everyone here to pay for socialized medicine. Take that you diehard Obamalovers. Hilarious that all the blue staters will be paying for expanded healthcare coverage in red states.
|
|
Posted by dave, a resident of the Duveneck/St. Francis neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 3:54 pm Nowhere have I seen a report that the majority of Palo Alto residents want this service if it costs money. Nor have I seen an estimate of how much it would cost each citizen to install in his/her home.
The best idea is trying to get the fiber network expanded to commercial areas. If commercial businesses don't want it, why should the individual homeowner pick up the tab?
|
|
Posted by Paul, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 5:12 pm "If commercial businesses don't want it, why should the individual homeowner pick up the tab? "
Commercial providers apparently don't expect private subscriptions to pay for the service, so they fear to touch it. Even the feds won't rush in. A naive city council is the only hope.
"Hilarious that all the blue staters will be paying for expanded healthcare coverage in red states."
Hilarious? Or Christian? "Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye did it unto one of these my brethren, even these least, ye did it unto me." Matthew 25:40. But what's this got to do with fiber?
|
|
Posted by ellieg, a resident of the Palo Verde neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 6:03 pm The seven million dollars that we now have in the fiber optic fund, came from the sale of the existing high speed network to several businesses in Palo Alto.
What exactly is wrong with using this money to expand the system to more users and generate more income to expand it further? It seems like a no-brainer to me.
I cannot believe the number of yahoos in this forum.
It seems they have no knowledge or real background and just want to display their ignorance to everyone else.
|
|
Posted by Lineman for the City, a resident of another community, on Jul 15, 2009 at 6:44 pm The last fiber to the home project was a complete bust. Why not learn from past mistakes?
|
|
Posted by Resident, a resident of the Community Center neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 7:22 pm I was part of the Fiber to the Home when it was first tried out a few years ago. It was completely and utterly dependable, fast, never went down. When I first had to switch to Comcast High Speed, when FTTH was no longer available, there were so many problems I finally was given the number of someone in the Comcast Executive Office who ultimately help solve a few of the problems. But Comcast will never hold a torch to fiber!
C'mon Palo Alto, this is the way to go, FIBER!
|
|
Posted by Outside Observer, a resident of another community, on Jul 15, 2009 at 8:09 pm Resident,
The original FTTH pilot program was set up before Benest, Harrison, Ulrich, Baum, Carlsen, Yeats, etc. were at the helm.
Not sure you would have the same experience now.
|
|
Posted by An Engineer, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Jul 15, 2009 at 10:30 pm "I was part of the Fiber to the Home when it was first tried out a few years ago. It was completely and utterly dependable, fast, never went down. When I first had to switch to Comcast High Speed, when FTTH was no longer available, there were so many problems..."
That FTTH trial was a limited and pampered prototype, while Comcast High Speed is a production system. You cannot make valid comparisons between them. Expect the Comcast level of reliability if FTTH is ever implemented citywide.
|
|
Posted by PAmoderate, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Jul 16, 2009 at 10:57 am Why not just lease it out to Verizon to do FIOS? Have some real competition.
|
|
Posted by Jee, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Jul 21, 2009 at 11:16 pm I think Obama should just come up with a national fiber optics plan for the entire country:
He should provide incentives and rebates in order to make FTTH possible. We are already losing competitiveness to China.
I'd say the Administration should consider reimbursing homeowners in major cities to upgrade to fiber and tax rebates of a lessor percentage to those who don't want to upgrade.
This would increase employment, stabilize house prices, improve productivity, encourage development of new products and services, etc...
|
|
Posted by resident, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Jul 22, 2009 at 10:37 am Jee, if only Obama would do what you propose - if only. Problem is, all the money the federal government has spent, including the federal reserve, has gone to bailout the banks and General Motors! There's nothing left. Haven't you heard that the government is printing so money that we're at risk of hyperinflation?
Do you think money just grows on trees? Someone's gotta pay for it all.
|
|
Posted by resident, a resident of the Adobe-Meadows neighborhood, on Jul 22, 2009 at 10:39 am Jee, one other thing, do you enjoy all the taxes you have to pay in California? How about that 1% sales tax increase we had this year?
Yes or No answer, please. Yes, you enjoy paying taxes, or No, you do not.
If Yes, then I guess you really do put your money where your mouth is for all these public programs. If No, then please, stop with the ridiculous suggestions.
|
|
Posted by Jee, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Jul 23, 2009 at 9:37 am We will recoup the cost in a few years. I don't call that ridiculous
Do you know how many jobs it will provide if we implement a national FO network and how much more efficient we will become?
Taxes are good if the money spent comes around. It is bad if money spent gets clogged up in a few entities/person/resources/etc. That is the problem with California - Tax Revenues are not being productively used.
Eg:
-I think teachers should take a salary cut for the sake of the nation.
-Police should by fewer cars or upgrade to something more efficient. No need for a V8.
Therefore, please don't criticize my ideas as it is only an idea. You should be criticizing Arnold if you are sick of taxes.
|
|
|
| |

2007 Awards from the California
Newspaper Publishers Association
Palo Alto Weekly
First Place
Local News Coverage
Local Breaking-News Story
Feature Story
Second Place
Feature Story
Environmental Reporting
Sports Coverage
General News Photo
Photo Essay
Freedom of Information
The Almanac
First Place
Environmental Reporting
Editorial Pages
Lifestyle Coverage
Second Place
Environmental Reporting
Mountain View Voice
Second Place
General Excellence
Editorial Comment
Front-Page Design
|
|
|