Sign up for Express
New from Palo Alto Online, Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!


Palo Alto Online Town Square Google
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Palo Alto, California Forecast
Palo Alto Online News
Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size

Marshland homeless camp given a reprieve
Residents of homeless encampment in East Palo Alto told to vacate property, but given an extra week to do so

Photos

View all photos (6)

Share
Residents of a homeless encampment with million-dollar views in East Palo Alto won a one-week reprieve from a small bulldozer that would have razed their makeshift tent-like homes Wednesday morning.

The 10 to 20 residents, who live in scattered tents, lean-tos and hand-dug caves on a parcel of dry-grass marshland at the end of Demeter Street, off Bay Road, say they received an informal eviction notice to vacate the property on Monday (June 15).

But with a small bucket bulldozer as a backdrop, homeless advocates, the landowner and city officials (by phone) worked out a one-week reprieve after a two-hour negotiation.

Advocates for the residents, some of whom have lived on the site undisturbed by police or the property owner for more than seven years, challenged the short notice as possibly illegal. They said the city has no shelter for its estimated 200 homeless persons. The only available facility is the Lord's Gym, a warming shelter open only during the coldest days of the year and run by Paul Bains, pastor .

"We recognize the property owner's rights but all we are asking for is for 30 days so we can help these people transition to a new home," Bains said. He said he spoke twice by phone to property owner Bob Facciola Wednesday morning to ask for more time but Facciola was unyielding.

Facciola had posted a sign on a chain-link fence Monday instructing the residents to remove their belongings by Wednesday morning or have them removed by force and taken to the dump. Trespassers would be removed by police, the notice said.

Residents fought back, producing a letter indicating they might pursue taking the property by adverse possession under a state law allowing persons to take over a property if they have been living there in a "notorious fashion" for five years -- a remote possibility because of stiff requirements under the law, including making improvements and paying property taxes. Destroying their personal possessions could also be illegal, the letter said.



Patsy Caracter, an advocate for the homeless with Bread Of Life Evangelistic Outreach, said she has heard police tell homeless individuals wandering around town to go to the Demeter Street encampment.

Bains and the Rev. Mary Frazier, senior pastor of Bread of Life Evangelical Outreach, said they want only more time to help move the residents.

Facciola arrived at the site about 9:30 a.m., shortly after the telephone conversations with Bains, He said he is concerned about mounds of garbage and feces and the potential liability if a fire breaks out in the grasslands, which are adjacent to homes, power lines and old greenhouses from East Palo Alto's days as a center of flower growing.

Nearly two years ago, a woman living in a cave dug into the side of a berm died in a blaze when a campfire set the dry grasses ablaze, he said.

"It's a liability. They're lighting fires at night," he said, waving an arm toward nearby homes.

But advocates said the homeless have been allowed to remain there for years and police have never bothered them, the gate remained unlocked and despite the tragedy two years ago Facciola never had the residents removed.

Caracter said she visits the encampment twice a week to bring residents food, water and meal vouchers. The baylands are the homeless population's last refuge, she said.

"Nobody knew they were out here. Our community was pushing them from one spot to another," she said.

She scoffed at the notion that Facciola is concerned about liability. She referred to the woman who died in the grassfire, asking, "Why didn't he get people out then if it was such a liability? Why now?"

But other plans could be behind the move to clear out the unsightly camps.

The 30-acre property is in the city's Ravenswood Business District redevelopment zone and is surrounded by other planned developments -- including Tara Road, a 4.9-acre, 41,000-square-foot industrial condominium development, and 2555 Pulgas, a 78-unit live-work and affordable housing development, according to city plans.

Facciola said about 12 acres of his property is buildable and was in escrow for $20 million until about two months ago. But Trumark, the planned builder, pulled out, citing the slumped housing market. Facciola said he is searching for a new buyer.

Martin Chiechi, senior vice president of Grubb and Ellis, the commercial real estate firm handling the property, said the company and Facciola are in the process of reevaluating the sale price for the current market. The area is zoned light industrial but is designated in the city's master plan for high-density housing, he said.

The land boasts sweeping views of the San Francisco Bay and East Bay hills, with the Dumbarton Bridge creating a silvery backdrop against the water and mountains.

Incongruously, facing the prime views are a half-dozen caves dug into the berm: 8-foot-deep holes, lined with plastic and tarps to keep out the rain. Steps to the caves are carved into the side of the berm. Shopping carts filled with salvaged aluminum cans sit nearby, to be turned in for cash.

"Shorty," a small woman in her 30s whose real name is Annette, pointed to a hole she used to live in before she got a tent.

"It's sort of like a bunker," she said. She leaned down to pet the encampment's resident cat, Pantera, which means panther in Spanish, she said.

"Here Mamma, here mamma," she called, as the cat wended through yellow grass and brushed the woman's leg with her tail.

"She's pregnant. I'll have to take her" if forced to move from the baylands, Shorty said, adding another layer to her concerns, prompting tears. "I've lived here for seven years," she said.

But getting the one-week reprieve was challenging. Parties on both sides made a flurry of cell-phone calls to city officials.

After two hours of negotiating, Facciola, Bains and Frazier came to an agreement: The homeless could stay until Wednesday, June 24, and City Manager Alvin James agreed to let the warming shelter open for 45 days to give residents time to relocate.

As the bulldozer started up, Candice Greenberg, executive director of Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto, who said she is looking into the legality of the forced removal, told camp residents to hurry to their shelters. She said she is not representing the residents as of now.

A cleaning crew dug up piles of trash but didn't take down the shelters or remove personal property.

Outside the cyclone fence, Bains pointed to an abandoned warehouse adjacent to the encampment that he and Frazier have been eyeing for some time as a potential shelter. But the city wants the building to be upgraded with plumbing and other amenities that would cost more than $500,000, which the churches do not have, he said.

Facciola turned to Bains, his face relaxed now that the conflict has been resolved for now.

"You've got to use your God muscle," he said of Bains' challenge.


Comments

Posted by larry moody, a resident of East Palo Alto, on Jun 18, 2009 at 9:40 am

Pastors Frazier & Bains, once again have demonstrated that leadership is the result of doing.Their effort to advocate for this homeless community in this 11hr situation,demonstrates once again that the Church remains relivant for the least of those amongst us.

Every church on the Peninsula should raise a special offering this weekend to assist,Lords Gym in provide emergency shelter for these residence of East Palo Alto.


Posted by Dave, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Jun 18, 2009 at 10:57 am

Doesn't anyone else see the irony here? To some people, the property owner is a villain for wanting to remove a clearly unhealthy camp from his property; yet an available empty building cannot be used to house the homeless because "the city wants the building to be upgraded with plumbing and other amenities that would cost more than $500,000, which the churches do not have[.]"

In other words, it's okay to pressure a property owner to accept conditions the city of EPA would not itself accept!


Posted by Joe Baldwin, a resident of the Downtown North neighborhood, on Jun 18, 2009 at 11:21 am

Deja vu all over again!

For many years 10-20 residents of Palo Alto lived on the south bank of San Francisquito Creek underneath the El Camino Real bridge. They were regulars at the Urban Ministry's drop-in center for coffee, care, and conversation. It was located outdoors behind the nearby Red Cross Building.

One day an unsigned eviction notice appeared under the bridge. Darryl Ogden was Executive Director of Urban Ministry of Palo Alto and I was its Board Chairman. We called Palo Alto Police Chief Pat Dwyer. Within minutes he determined that the anonymous warning had been posted by the Police Chief of Menlo Park. That city's then Mayor lived on the north bank of the creek.

In those days the standard joke was "Why are there no homeless people in Menlo Park?" Answer: "Their police pick them up, drive them over the bridge and drop them off in Palo Alto."

We succeeded in getting a temporary reprieve to find alternative shelter. Cathy Espinosa Howard, Palo Alto's Director of Human Services, played a major role in that effort.

About a week later, however, the unhoused were escorted out of their encampment. All their belongings were rope-hoisted up onto trucks for disposal.

Efforts to "solve the homeless problem" were re-doubled.

More than ten years and $23 million later, we opened the Opportunity Center.

Sad to say, the number of our unhoused residents today is about the same as it was 20 years ago.


Posted by YSK, a resident of the Old Palo Alto neighborhood, on Jun 18, 2009 at 11:53 am

Great observation Dave. Ok for a private person to assume liability, but not the city. There is another way to look at it. The 'residents' had 7 years to live there, rent free due to the tolerance of this owner. Now they have to move on. Happens to people paying rent in houses too. We've had to move three times in just over three years due to owners selling out from under us. It sucks, but it's reality.


Posted by or mt view, a resident of the Charleston Meadows neighborhood, on Jun 18, 2009 at 12:58 pm

lotsa vacant industry buildings in mt view near shoreline


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jun 19, 2009 at 1:10 am
Walter_E_Wallis is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online

There will always be a need for a caravansary with minimum sanitary facilities. Pity our city lacks the wit.


Posted by Churches, a resident of East Palo Alto, on Jun 19, 2009 at 10:13 am

The pressure to house these folks should not all be on the churches. While there is a huge faith community here and the churches play a crucial role, this issue goes beyond what the churches can provide in these trying times. The City of EPA needs to step up to the plate.

While I feel for these folks that are homeless, I do feel bad for the property owner as well, as it is his right to develop or sell his land. If the other laws in place support the homeless folks right to squat there, I can't see that leading to anything positive in the long run. They have had many years of free land use, near Ecumenical Hunger where they can receive food, clothing, etc. Not an ideal situation for me, but for those living there, it could've been a lot worse.

Again, the City of EPA MUST step up and do something.


Posted by Walter_E_Wallis, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Jun 19, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Walter_E_Wallis is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online

There is a field in architecture called minimum solutions. We need that in city planning, too. Either accommodate the needs of everyone or admit to limits, and don't add to their burdens.


Add a Comment

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: * Not sure?
Comment: *

2007 Awards from the California Newspaper Publishers Association

Palo Alto Weekly

First Place
Local News Coverage
Local Breaking-News Story
Feature Story

Second Place
Feature Story
Environmental Reporting
Sports Coverage
General News Photo
Photo Essay
Freedom of Information

The Almanac

First Place
Environmental Reporting
Editorial Pages
Lifestyle Coverage

Second Place
Environmental Reporting

Mountain View Voice

Second Place
General Excellence
Editorial Comment
Front-Page Design

 

landscape garden design
graphics and computer consulting support
state quarter trading
Palo Alto Online   © 2010 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.