News

East Palo Alto police chief candidates named in three federal lawsuits

Two finalists for head cop job have been sued

Two finalists for East Palo Alto's police chief position are, or have been, the subjects of federal lawsuits, according to documents filed in U.S. District Court Northern District in San Jose.

Retired San Jose police Lt. Brian Ferrante is currently being sued civilly for allegedly making false statements and presenting false evidence related to a 2008 murder case and for allegedly illegally searching a San Jose business that did not match the address on a search warrant on Dec. 9, 2012, according to court documents.

San Francisco Capt. Albert Pardini, also up for the East Palo Alto job, was sued for violating a legal observer's civil rights during a demonstration, court documents showed.

A U.S. District Court judge has thrown out the first case against Ferrante, finding that Ferrante had just cause to arrest a murder suspect. The plaintiff in that case has filed a federal appeal.

That first lawsuit, filed March 5, 2010, alleges that Ferrante and another officer, Tom Morales, violated plaintiff Ramon Jose Vasquez's constitutional rights after they arrested him and he spent five months in Santa Clara County Jail for a murder he did not commit. The charges against Vasquez were dismissed two days before his preliminary hearing on Aug. 20, 2008, and he was declared factually innocent by a Superior Court judge on Feb. 23, 2010, according to court papers.

Vasquez was charged with the Feb. 2, 2008, murder of 18-year-old Rogelio Silva in the parking lot of an In-N-Out restaurant on Capitol Expressway in San Jose. One of the alleged Nortenos gang members shot the victim after a fight broke out between a large group of Mt. Pleasant High School students and a group of suspected Norteno gang members.

Two suspects were described as the alleged shooter and an instigator, and Vasquez was initially linked to the crime by witnesses who saw a white Charger he owned leave the scene. Two witnesses told police that he "looked like" the suspected shooter after being shown a photographic lineup, according to court papers.

The lawsuit claims that Vasquez did not fit the shooter's description in height or body build and that a tattoo on his neck that states "Thug Lord" was not a gang tattoo, which witnesses said the shooter had.

Other witnesses positively identified two other men in the lineups, and they were linked to the crime scene through their vehicles, physical descriptions and cell phone records, according to the lawsuit.

In a sworn statement for the arrest and search of Vasquez, Ferrante described Vasquez as a "documented associate" of a Norteno gang called Capitol Park Locos. The lawsuit alleges that Ferrante knew Vasquez was not a Norteno nor an associate of the gangs and that he fabricated that information to get a judge to sign the arrest warrant.

Vasquez was arrested and lost his job of seven years at the Coca Cola company, according to the lawsuit. Inmates threatened him with physical violence, and at one point, he was forced to drink toilet water when the plumbing broke for 24 hours. He became depressed and suicidal and was placed on medication, and his fiance and two children were forced to relocate after his arrest, according to the lawsuit.

But U.S. District Court Judge Edward Davila didn't agree with the allegations. He dismissed the case, finding that Ferrante had probable cause based on Vasquez's car being placed near the scne, although it was driven by Vasquez's brother, and that Vasquez had been involved in a 2007 vandalism and assault incident during which the perpetrators allegedly shouted gang slogans.

The second case involving Ferrante was filed on Nov. 14, 2012, and names the Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office and several investigators, detectives and police officers as defendants. Plaintiffs Kevin and Danna Keifer filed a civil rights complaint after police raided and ransacked their San Jose business on a warrant for another address next door.

Ferrante was a member of a strike team for that incident.

The Keifers had rented a building they own to MediLeaf, a medical marijuana dispensary in Gilroy, which officers had raided after believing the dispensary's operations were illegal. The Keifers had no association with MediLeaf other than being its landlord, according to the complaint.

The lawsuit claims the DA's office was targeting landlords who dared to rent their buildings to medical marijuana dispensaries. The DA's office obtained a warrant for another MediLeaf location at 1340 Meridian Ave., San Jose, and listed Kevin Keifer in the warrant. But police raided the adjacent address at 1338 Meridian, and ransacked the premises despite being told they were at the wrong place. They arrested Kevin Keifer and held Danna Keifer for four hours until they obtained a valid search warrant. No criminal charges were filed against the Keifers. That case is ongoing in Superior Court.

Pardini was sued in federal and superior courts in 2001 and 2002 by a legal observer assigned to the National Lawyers Guild. The man was to observe a demonstration at a National Association of Broadcasters conference in San Francisco when police received an order from Pardini and another superior not to let the demonstrators or lawyers into the building.

The observer, Lawrence Hildes, was allegedly slammed into the ground and choked with a baton by officers under Pardini after arguing with one of the officers. He later passed out in his jail cell and was taken to San Francisco General Hospital, according to the lawsuits.

A judge dismissed the federal lawsuit in 2001 after the Hildes did not continue the case, and a superior court judge dismissed the second case in April 2003 after Hildes' attorney did not show up in court, according to court records.

Ferrante said he could not comment since the lawsuits are ongoing. Pardini could not be reached for comment.

Outgoing City Manager Magda Gonzalez will make the final choice for police chief. She was not available for comment. But Assistant City Manager Barbara Powell said she could not comment on the court cases, as the city does not have the information in its possession.

"However, prior to a police chief being appointed, the individual must go through an extensive vetting process pursuant to the Police Officers Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.) requirements. The selected candidate is required to go through an extensive background investigation, a psychological examination and a physical examination.

"The background investigation would reveal any legal matters, and would also typically reveal the issues behind the legal matters, how they were resolved, etc.," she said in an email.

Related content:

East Palo Alto introduces police chief candidates

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by al munday
a resident of another community
on Aug 14, 2014 at 10:13 am

So these EPA PD chief candidates have violated rights...to me that is a red flag as to be dropped from candidate list..like DUH....


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bru
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 14, 2014 at 12:06 pm

Bru is a registered user.

>> "However, prior to a police chief being appointed, the individual
>> must go through an extensive vetting process pursuant to the
>> Police Officers Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.) requirements.
>> The selected candidate is required to go through an extensive
>> background investigation, a psychological examination and a
>> physical examination.

>>>>>> extensive vetting process

Since they report on virtually nothing of this procedure, this is pure branding, like when a company puts "All Natural Home Made Ingredients" ... this is BS. Keep out the meaningless unqualified adjectives!

And why does this story mix up the discussion of these two men ... bouncing between them from paragraph to paragraph?


And who makes those decisions and what connections do they have to the City of East Palo Alto?


Lot's of problems with this article, it does not serve the public at all in terms of informing them, and it's more of a non-specific smear on both these guys.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mark Dinan
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Aug 14, 2014 at 12:16 pm

Mark Dinan is a registered user.

Getting sued and being found guilty are two different things. My inclination would be to let the legal system work, although on a day like today with Ferguson in the news, that may be difficult. It is hard to make a judgment without having direct & specific knowledge of the case, and the officer's role in it. I would hope that EPA would make an in depth investigation into accusations before extending an offer. If the city manager is out the door and does not have to live with the consequences, perhaps this is a decision that should be postponed.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Larry Hildes
a resident of another community
on Aug 15, 2014 at 12:37 pm

The story as to Pardini is essentially correct. I was there not only as a legal observer, but as an attorney for the folks arrested. I was asked to go into the Hall of Justice to locate the folks, who had been arrested at a different location. There was no demonstration going in at the Hall and SFPD refused to tell us where the arestees had been taken.
When I attempted to gain entry Pardini and other officers blocked me and insisted I was going to disrupt business and demonstrate at the Hall of Justice =, a building where I regularly represented clients in hearings.

When I verbally argued and then threatened legal action, as it is a crime in CA to deny an attorney access to their clients, Pardini threw me to the ground and choked me until I nearly passed out and then handcuffed me and brought me into teh building and put me in a hlding cell, where I did pass out.

I was newly married, and my wife gt a call from Sf General whereI was taken,could not find a cab and spent two hours getting to me by bus.

I was in severe pain for weeks,a nd we were in teh iddle of a house hunt, which then got delayed by a week while I recovered.

It wAS TERRIFYING!

criminal charges were threatened but never filed against me.

I filed suit n Federal Curt, but had to drop the case after we moved up to Washington State and couldn't return for a hearing due to scheduling issues.

Pardini showed remarkably poor judgment, and as attorney who does police misconduct cases all the time, was still shocking to me [portion removed.]

I am more then willing to speak about his fitness and this incident.

Larry Hildes,
CSB #178610, WSBA # 35035




Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Flirtation
By Chandrama Anderson | 4 comments | 1,550 views

King of the Slides
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 1,191 views

Standardized Test Prep: When to Start and Whom to Hire?
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 768 views

The Future of our Parks: Public Workshops this Week
By Cathy Kirkman | 0 comments | 591 views

NO MEAT ATHLETE Workout/Running Group
By Max Greenberg | 2 comments | 569 views