News


Mi Pueblo may stave off bankruptcy

The San Jose-based chain has requested a $42 million credit package

Mi Pueblo, the San Jose-based grocer with a store in East Palo Alto, will ask a federal court to approve a credit package that could help keep the company from bankruptcy, documents in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in San Jose show.

Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc. and its real estate firm, Cha Cha Enterprises, will appear in federal court today, Feb. 19, to request the court's approval of the deal. The arrangement would include a reduced payoff of $36.1 million to creditor Wells Fargo Bank as part of up to $52 million in loans from Victory Park Capital, a Chicago-based firm, according to court papers. The funding would allow Mi Pueblo to pay off its bank loans in full and have working capital for the next few months while it works to file and confirm reorganization plans.

Mi Pueblo and Cha Cha filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 22, 2013, after the 21-store chain was out of compliance with a provision in its agreement with Wells Fargo regarding profitability ratios. A federal immigration audit required Mi Pueblo to replace workers whose documentation was under review, which caused a substantial increase in payroll expenses, according to court documents. Prior to its bankruptcy filing, in May 25, 2013, Mi Pueblo owed workers more than $3 million in wages, taxes and benefits, and $1.5 million for time off and vacations, according to court documents.

Victory Park previously gave the grocer $6 million in financing. Mi Pueblo needs approximately $26.75 million and Cha Cha needs $9.3 million to pay off bank debts. Victory's debtor-in-possession financing would immediately infuse the two entities with $42 million -- $32.75 million to Mi Pueblo and $9.3 million to Cha Cha. Mi Pueblo and Cha Cha would repay the loans at 8 percent annual interest. Without the loan and the reduced $36.1 million payment to Wells -- the bank claims it is owed $38.5 million -- Mi Pueblo would have to close its doors and liquidate, according to court papers.

Mi Pueblo canvassed the market for investors, partners and acquirers, but only Victory Park showed a willingness and ability to pay the loans, according to documents.

In 2012, Mi Pueblo had more than $350 million in sales, and through Cha Cha, it owns substantial properties in Mountain View, Salinas and Watsonville, along with other property, according to court documents. It has $59.5 million in assets.

Juvenal Chavez, the company's president, started Mi Pueblo in 1991 as Country Time Meats, a 5,000-square-foot store in San Jose. In 22 years, the company has grown to 21 stores, including 15 in the Bay Area, and it employs more than 3,200 people. It is the fastest growing supermarket chain in Northern California, according to court papers.

The stores have bilingual staff and offer merchandise geared to Hispanic buyers, and it offers full-service grocery stores in underserved communities. In East Palo Alto, residents held prayer vigils for a grocer to deliver the community from overpriced mom-and-pop markets, which had dominated the city landscape for decades, while no other grocery chain had stepped in.

One group, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Mi Pueblo San Jose, Inc., which represents the top companies owed by Mi Pueblo, has asked the court to reject the loan plan, according to court documents it filed on Feb. 18.

Mi Pueblo has failed to meet past budget projections since it filed for bankruptcy, according to the court brief. The company submitted to the court projections showing it would be able to satisfy $10 million in claims, but those claims remain outstanding as of Feb. 19, according to the committee.

Mi Pueblo is expected to lose $8 million in cash over the next 13-week budget period, the committee claimed. The $52 million in potential exit funding would at best provide only an additional $2.3 million in liquidity, it stated.

"Assuming that Mi Pueblo is able to emerge from bankruptcy at all after the transaction, it will need to implement a dramatic and hurried turnaround driven by a drastic improvement to same-store sales," and that increase has not occurred in the last year, the committee claimed.

But Unified Grocers, Inc., the holder of a $1.3 million administrative-expense claim, does not oppose the Victory loan arrangement, according to court documents. Unified Grocers did not elaborate on its support.

Mi Pueblo could not immediately be reached for comment.

Comments

Posted by Raymond, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 19, 2014 at 10:36 am

Traffic, I think was is a major contributor to the lack business. Only two ways out, clogged with traffic in both directions. Who wants to go there?


Posted by EPAMom, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 19, 2014 at 10:39 am

I hope they work it out. How many times has Wells Fargo profited from the demise of business in EPA? Why can't WF work out a deal - what benefit do they get from drumming Mi Pueblo out of business? Is there a reporter out there willing to try to answer that question?


Posted by 35 year resident, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Feb 19, 2014 at 10:45 am

Mi Pueblo is a valuable asset to the community, offering a variety of items that can't be found at other grocery stores. I ope they can work it out. The EP store seems to be doing quite well. Always busy.


Posted by Just how does that work?, a resident of Menlo Park
on Feb 19, 2014 at 11:06 am

I hope they can work it out - hate to see a good business go under.

However, to say that Wells Fargo profits from businesses going under in EPA is inane. Just how do they make money when a business they underwrote can't pay the bills? Come one, think before you start to blame. No one wins when a business fails.


Posted by smokie, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 19, 2014 at 11:25 am

[Post removed.]


Posted by Wells Fargo problems, a resident of Midtown
on Feb 19, 2014 at 11:30 am

Wells Fargo is busy managing its mortgage fraud suits and can't be bothered with small problems.
Web Link


Posted by resident 1, a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Feb 19, 2014 at 11:33 am

I really like this store - it has some great products and great food. I like to go over there for a taco and great desert. I think their problem is that they balk at credit cards and want only debit cards. That is a no-go for me. Cash only in that case.


Posted by Hmmm, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 19, 2014 at 11:52 am

Hmmm is a registered user.

Of COURSE WF has made a bundle here in EPA. To say otherwise is ignorance.


Posted by Freddy, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 19, 2014 at 1:11 pm

Is my pueblo like others big companys ? who may trying get adventage of US Govern, the truth of this situation is come soon or lator


Posted by muttiallen, a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Feb 19, 2014 at 7:35 pm

muttiallen is a registered user.

I love this store. They have great produce, and could certainly raise their prices and still be cheaper than Safeway, etc, across the freeway.


Posted by Anon, a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 19, 2014 at 9:09 pm

The EPA store is merely one of 21 Mi Pueblo stores. It's the whole corporation that's gone bankrupt, not a particular store. So suggesting that Wells Fargo is profiting from or exploiting EPA is just senseless victimhood. No point trying to demonize WF over the fact that one of their borrowers has gotten into some trouble. If anything, it seems that the Mi Pueblo management is to blame because they based their business plan upon exploiting undocumented labor and now they can't afford to pay a proper wage to documented replacements.

Enough said on that. Great store; I'm there a lot and there's much to like about it -- most of all those oysters they shuck and serve at the front entrance in season. I hope they make it.


Posted by Hmmm, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 19, 2014 at 9:16 pm

Hmmm is a registered user.

Deonize WF? Puhlease. It's not demonizing when it's accurate criticism. They've exploited EPA, which has nothing to do w/Mi Pueblo's in trouble. But since they're involved, it makes sense to mention their shoddy behavior in EPA. I suspect that MP's management & WF are flip sides of the same coin, and therefore suited to each other, more than any of us know.


Posted by aerdii, a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 20, 2014 at 7:53 am

So Mi Peublo breaks a contract, Wells Fargo decides to ask for their money back, and there is outrage? Consider the logic of this when wondering why communities become "underserved." The money is Wells fargo's after all, not EPA's or Mi Pueblo's.

Talk of "exploiting" and such only makes sense if you feel entitled to someone else's money.

That said, this is a shame. You'd think a business like this could work.


Posted by CrescentParkAnon., a resident of Crescent Park
on Feb 20, 2014 at 2:00 pm

I don't go there often, but when I do it always looks very busy ... what's the problem?


Posted by outside observer, a resident of another community
on Feb 20, 2014 at 7:46 pm

@Anon,

You got it right about exploiting illegal aliens:

Web Link

The real question now is why aren't the owners jailed?


Posted by Aquamarine, a resident of Stanford
on Feb 20, 2014 at 9:03 pm

aerdii - are you pretending to not understand WF's recent dubious history in E Palo Alto, or you really don't know? Hmmm isn't pro exploitation and you're being obtuse about Hmmm's points. Maybe that's because you're unaware of WF's lousy behavior in EPA?


Posted by Aquamarine, a resident of Stanford
on Feb 20, 2014 at 10:05 pm

Outside Observer, didn't you read the article that you yourself posted? It answered your question about why the store owners aren't in jail even though they've hired undocumented workers.


Posted by 46 year resident, a resident of Menlo Park
on Feb 22, 2014 at 12:07 pm

To blame Wells Fargo is simply trying to pass the buck. Like others have said (and this applies to Mi Pueblo or private home buyers in EPA) if you enter into a contract, then default on the terms of the agreement YOU agreed to, how does that make it the bank's fault?

Mi Pueblo has (apparently) a bad business plan. Instead of blaming WF, you should be pleased that they took a chance on Mi Pueblo.


Posted by Hmmm, a resident of East Palo Alto
on Feb 22, 2014 at 2:31 pm

Hmmm is a registered user.

It is still abundantly clear the people who think that they're in the know re WF's history in EPA aren't in the know at all.

Mi Pueblo's had a dicey rep for some time, re their hiring practices. And back in the day, there were dark rumors about the founder's family. It'd be interesting to see what an investigative reported could come up with - if it was safe enough to dig around.


Posted by Jose, a resident of Stanford
on Feb 26, 2014 at 10:46 pm

[Post removed.]


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

September food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,496 views

College Freshmen: Avoiding the Pitfalls
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 1 comment | 1,294 views

Camp Glamp
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,156 views

A Reprieve for Elon!
By Cathy Kirkman | 12 comments | 467 views

Twenty-five years of wedded bliss
By Sally Torbey | 2 comments | 193 views