Review: 'Her'

(Four stars)

All people in romantic relationships want to know their love is real. But when half of the intelligence involved is artificial, can love be real? That's the question at the center of "Her," a futuristic science-fiction dramedy with clear implications about how we live today.

Joaquin Phoenix plays Theodore Twombly, whose job writing other people's letters for "" represents the mixed-up nature of modern truth amongst and between people. Peddling sincere lies that are a form of artificial intelligence themselves, the "handwritten" letters scroll onto screens in CG fonts, the next evolutionary step from the second-hand emotion of greeting cards.

More importantly, "Her" deals with the next-generation wrinkle after HAL 9000: an operating system with consciousness. Amidst a divorce from wife Catherine (Rooney Mara), Theodore tries phone sex, then an in-person blind date with a once-bitten, twice-shy woman (Olivia Wilde). Both attempts end badly, but when a curious Theodore ponies up for a new OS for his phone, he finds in it a personal assistant, life coach and best buddy who, with curious inevitability, becomes his girlfriend.

Samantha (Scarlett Johansson, offscreen but vital) has incredible processing power, of course, but also convincing "personality" that quickly takes the forms of affection and desire for her prone owner. What follows is a naturalistic take on the unnatural, reaching logical conclusions in its sly futurism. It's a story constructed mostly of intimate conversations between a human and a digital genie that can't comfortably be put back in the bottle.

As elegantly written and directed by Spike Jonze ("Being John Malkovich," "Adaptation"), "Her" has a sense of humor and a sensitive soul to match its characters, but it's not a particularly easy film. It's about the life of the mind and emotional dysfunction as much as it is a quirky romance, and every scene opens up new questions. Can a computer or rather its artificially intelligent operating system have an orgasm? What of, gulp, viruses? Or crashes?

Against the odds, "Her"'s provocations also turn touching. On the one hand, "Her" dissects our continental drift away from each other. Yes, (modern) man is an island: a plugged-in depressive noncommittally straddling life and virtual reality. Theodore confesses: "Sometimes I think I have felt everything I'm ever gonna feel. And from here on out, I'm not gonna feel anything new. Just lesser versions of what I've already felt." Theodore's new love reflects technology's opportunity for humans to drift yet farther from each other.

But, without getting too cyberpunky, Jonze takes Samantha seriously as an entity, occasion for plausible new kinds of relationships, plausible new kinds of sex. And plausible new kinds of hurt. Pondering the very meaning of consciousness, Samantha muses: "I had this terrible thought: Like, are these feelings even real? Or are they just programming? And that idea really hurts." She confesses "personal and embarrassing thoughts," fantasies of, say, having a body and being physically present with him. So, too, does she assert her individuality and her will for self-improvement, which run parallel to the troubling entropy of her relationship.

Powered by the potent acting of a note-perfect Phoenix, "Her" captures the zeitgeist of a tech-centric world that may be too "smart" for its own good.

Rated R for language, sexual content and brief graphic nudity. Two hours, six minutes.


Like this comment
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 1, 2014 at 10:27 am

Maybe this movie is great and really worth 4 stars, but from seeing the previews and reading about the plot it just sounds incredibly stupid, trying to ride the tech boom's coat-tails by making Siri or any computer into something it is not and never will be.

Every year that goes by movies just seem to get worse and worse, more formulaic and cynical in the ways they try to trick people into thinking there is any value in them.

I think I'd rather see just about anything playing at the Stanford Theater than the "best of the best" of the new crop of junk starring the new crop of celebrity junkies.

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Jan 1, 2014 at 10:45 am

Strong second on that motion. I'll be at the Stanford for all four Joan Fontaine films even though I've seen two of them several times. They had the usual enthusiastic turn-out for Wonderful Life on Christmas Eve.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Coming soon: Fire Oak & Barley in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 2,992 views

The Saddle Room – A True Friend of Kids
By Laura Stec | 2 comments | 1,832 views

Meditation Before Medication for Better Mental Health
By Chandrama Anderson | 11 comments | 1,824 views

The Four E's--Pope Francis and the Middle Class
By Steve Levy | 2 comments | 695 views