News


Palo Alto sees revenue windfall

Showing 'solid' post-recession recovery, strong tax returns will help city fund infrastructure repairs

If California's economic outlook is warming up these days, Palo Alto's is downright sizzling.

With the local economy booming and just about every revenue category experiencing growth, the city is charging into the new year on a happy financial note, according to the recently released Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for fiscal year 2013. The numbers have come as a bit of a surprise to city officials, who raised their budget expectations in March, only to see the real numbers climb $3.5 million above the adjusted projections.

At the Nov. 19 meeting of the City Council Finance Committee, the city's Chief Financial Officer Lalo Perez noted that the city's revenues are now higher than they were before the Great Recession of 2008.

This includes a record high in documentary-transfer tax, which is derived from real-estate transactions and which spiked from $4.8 million in 2012 to $6.8 million in 2013, a 41 percent increase. Hotel-tax revenues rose by 11.3 percent, from $9.7 million to $10.8 million; sales taxes jumped by 15.8 percent from $22.1 million to $25.6 million; and property taxes increased by 8.3 percent, going from $26.5 million to $28.7 million.

"We continue to see revenues returning from the recession years, with strong growth in virtually all of our major tax revenues, particularly sales tax and transient-occupancy tax (also known as hotel tax)," David Ramberg, assistant director of the Administrative Services Department, told the Finance Committee.

Like other jurisdictions across the country, Palo Alto is now "in a solid recovery mode," a report from the department states.

"In the past year, there has been a rebound in economically sensitive revenue sources such as sales tax, which was driven by department store, electronics and auto sales," the report states. "Increased business and real estate activities within the city resulted in higher transient-occupancy tax and documentary-transfer tax revenues."

The trend is expected to continue in fiscal year 2014, which began on July 1. On Wednesday, the city released the financial results from the first quarter of 2014 (the Finance Committee is scheduled to discuss this report on Dec. 3). The numbers are even more stark. Sales taxes are up by 48 percent when compared with the first quarter of 2013, having risen from $3.7 million to $5.4 million. Hotel taxes, meanwhile, jumped from $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2013 to $2 million in the first quarter of 2014, a 57 percent increase.

The surging revenues helped offset a 31 percent dip in service fees, a trend related to the renovation of the city's golf course (which resulted in a dip in golf fees) and a $1.2 million decrease in plan-check fees, which indicates less building activity.

City officials also expect the documentary-transfer revenues to continue their upward climb. Joe Saccio, deputy director of Administrative Services, told the committee on Nov. 19 that the high number of real-estate transactions the city has been seeing in recent months is forcing the city to revise its projections.

"We are going to be raising it (projected documentary-tax revenues) in the midyear considerably, and it is going to exceed $6.8 million, we believe, based on what we're seeing now," Saccio said.

He noted that the number of real-estate transactions are up almost 10 percent from the prior year, and that property values involved in the transactions are exceeding the prior year's. It also doesn't hurt that the city has several new hotels preparing to open their doors, including at the downtown site of the recently shuttered Casa Olga and on the former Palo Alto Bowl site near the southern edge of the city.

The committee welcomed the financial news, with Vice Mayor Nancy Shepherd lauding the fact that revenues are now higher than they were before 2008 and Councilman Greg Schmid congratulating staff on the revenue outlook.

"We seem to be in the midst of a very nice period," Schmid said.

The committee's discussion came at a time when state and county officials are also shaking off the doldrums of the recent economic meltdown. The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office released a report earlier this month that projects a $5.6 billion surplus in the state's budget reserve. Much like the city, the state has revised its expectations upwards in recent months. The report cited the "restrained state budget" that Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature agreed on for 2013-14 and notes that the office's "forecast of state revenue collections has increased since last year."

"Accordingly, we now find that California's state budget is even more promising than we projected one year ago," the LAO report states.

In Palo Alto, the brightening outlook is expected to give the city a big boost in addressing its backlog of infrastructure problems, which include more than $200 million in needed new facilities. These include a new police headquarters to replace the small and seismically unfit one at City Hall and the rehabilitation of two obsolete fire stations. A specially appointed Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Commission also identified about $42 million in needed maintenance, work that the new revenues are expected to help fund.

In addition to approving the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, the committee agreed to transfer $8.9 million from the city's General Fund to the Infrastructure Reserve, bringing the total amount of surplus funds transferred between the two to $16.5 million since 2012. Even after the transfer, the city ended fiscal year 2013 with a General Fund reserve of more than $30 million.

"Those are healthy contributions to the infrastructure priority as set out by Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Commission and also the City Council," Ramberg told the committee. "Clearly, there is still a liability on the infrastructure side that must be addressed, but these are opportunities for us to contribute in the years that we've recently had and again this year."

It helped, Ramberg said, that the city had achieved greater savings than expected from City Hall staffing vacancies. Furthermore, recent negotiations with labor groups, which resulted in greater cost-sharing on medical expenses and new contributions for health care by employees, are expected to save the city nearly $9 million annually.

Comments

Posted by common sense, a resident of Midtown
on Nov 29, 2013 at 3:36 pm

Glad to see the surplus. The city council should put all of the surplus into a fund for a new public safety building, and put the same amount or more in each of the succeeding years, rather than spend it on any pet projects.


Posted by Cheapskate, a resident of College Terrace
on Nov 29, 2013 at 4:51 pm

What goes up must come down, so don't go gaga on spending the surplus. Save a good amount for the rainy days.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Midtown
on Nov 30, 2013 at 6:27 am

Has anyone noticed a degradation of services as a result of those city hall vacancies?
I know I haven't!

How about making some of those vacancies permanent?


Posted by no pay raises, a resident of Ventura
on Dec 3, 2013 at 10:38 am

If the city is responsible, it will not give out any unnecessary pay raises. Instead, it should use the surplus responsibly. Spending on infrastructure or creating a rainy day fund would make the most sense to me.


Posted by Potholes, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 3, 2013 at 11:08 am

Just fix the damn streets already. And don't do it with 6 managers and 2 workers.


Posted by TimH, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Dec 3, 2013 at 11:10 am

This is good news, but strangely counter to another article in today's updates, "Palo Alto streets could be swept less often" (12/03/2013) at Web Link. There is some irony to claim here, even conceding that even longstanding programs such as leaf banishment should be reviewed for cost efficacy.

How are various programs being managed concurrently by Palo Alto leadership? Also, with regards to Palo Alto Online, is there a unified reporting strategy regarding civic news or do you publish stories by more of an independent nature?


Posted by Garden Gnome, a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 3, 2013 at 11:27 am

Or they could use the money towards infrastructure instead of raising taxes.

Nah..who am I kidding? Let's spend it all!


Posted by Mom, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Dec 3, 2013 at 2:17 pm

Can we save the extra cash to fund our long term pension obligations?


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

See Me. Hear Me. Donít Fix Me.
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,859 views

Foothills Park: a world away
By Sally Torbey | 14 comments | 1,767 views

Universal Language
By Cheryl Bac | 3 comments | 1,432 views

On Tour at Selective Schools: Chapman, La Verne, Redlands, Whittier
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,382 views

Two Days to Save This Dog?
By Cathy Kirkman | 10 comments | 711 views