News

Google fined $22.5M for privacy 'misrepresentations'

Search giant charged with planting cookies on computers of Apple's Safari users

Google will be required to pay a $22.5 million penalty after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged the Mountain View-based Internet search giant with misrepresenting its privacy settings to its users.

The privacy settlement, which according to the FTC is the largest penalty ever for violation of a commission order, came after a Stanford University graduate student uncovered the company's placement of "cookies" on users' computers even if they use Apple's Safari browser, which is set by default to block the cookies. Cookies are data that is stored in a browser that tracks users' online activities. They are often used by companies to send targeted ads to users.

In addition to the penalty, the FTC's order requires Google to "disable all tracking cookies it had said it would not place on consumers' computers," according to a commission statement.

Jonathan Mayer, the Stanford student who brought Google's cookie policy to light, wrote in a February post on his blog that Google and Vibrant Media (a company that specializes in display advertising) "intentionally circumvent Safari's privacy feature." He also provided on his blog a detailed technical analysis of Apple's Safari browser and the process Google followed for planting cookies despite the privacy features.

The FTC charged in its complaint that Google had been placing cookies on computers of Safari users for several months in 2011 and 2012, "although Google had previously told these users they would automatically be opted out of such tracking, as a result of the default setting of the Safari browser used in Macs, iPhones and iPads."

According to the FTC, Google's "misrepresentations" violated its October 2011 settlement with the FTC, which barred the company from "misrepresenting the extent to which consumers can exercise control over the collection of their information."

The commission issued a statement Thursday, Aug. 9, saying that its settlement "is intended to provide a strong message to Google and other companies under order that their actions will be under close scrutiny and that the Commission will respond to violations quickly and vigorously."

"No matter how big or small, all companies must abide by FTC orders against them and keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place," John Leibowitz, chairman of the FTC, said in a statement.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by blame
a resident of Adobe-Meadows
on Aug 9, 2012 at 10:25 am

I blame Apple, not Google, for Apple's insecure web browser.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by wow
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Aug 9, 2012 at 11:16 am

Of course you do. Google's wilful and fraudulent misrepresentations are entirely beside the point. Why should Google be penalized for lying to the FTC. Just because Google circumvented apple's privacy settings is also beside the point.

The point is Apple is the culprit because...because... because you say so. Let's not let the facts stand in the way of who we want to blame.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wondering?
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 9, 2012 at 3:06 pm

Maybe it's too late to be asking this question, but what gives the FTC the power over the "planting of cookies" on my, or anyone's machines? Is there Federal legislation effectively declaring "cookies" some sort of "controlled substance"?

Or is the FTC off sticking its nose in somewhere it doesn't really have the authority to be?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,426 views

Ode to Brussels Sprout
By Laura Stec | 20 comments | 2,617 views

Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,941 views

Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 1,379 views

It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 402 views