News


Editorial: Toxics don't belong next to homes

Zoning should prohibit use of industrial toxic chemicals near Barron Park and other neighborhoods

The six-year conflict between Barron Park residents and Communications & Power Industries (CPI) over the company's use of toxic chemicals illustrates the difficulty of removing a legal non-conforming use from a neighborhood that is threatened by a spill or the accidental release of these dangerous substances.

Located at 811 Hansen Way in one of the original Varian Associates buildings built in 1953, CPI is one of the few companies left that are operating hazardous production processes in a research park that has gradually evolved to be dominated by office uses.

And while Barron Park was developed after Varian built its facility, concern over the toxic hazards to the neighborhood didn't arise until CPI expanded its plating operation in 2006 and soon after accidentally released nitric acid into the air and raised alarms in Barron Park.

Residents became more concerned in March 2008, when CPI spilled a hydrochloric acid and water solution in a rear driveway and then two months later, dumped nearly 50 gallons of wastewater containing copper and nickel into Matadero Creek.

The three incidents galvanized the neighbors, who have persistently tried to get CPI's hazardous activities stopped. Monday night, more than a dozen Barron Park residents pressed the council to force CPI to either move or stop its use of toxic chemicals. Such substances should not be located so close to their homes, they said.

"This plating shop is right behind our neighborhood," said Samir Tuma, a Barron Park resident who lives on Chimalus Drive near CPI. "A plating shop with potassium cyanide and nitric acid does not belong right next door to our neighborhood."

It shouldn't be allowed next to any neighborhood, and the City Council appears on track to do what should have been done long ago: provide reasonable notice to CPI that the use of toxic chemicals next to residential neighborhoods will be prohibited.

Complicating the matter for the council were assertions from CPI president and chief executive officer Bob Fickett, who said the amount of chemicals stored at the company are now below the threshold of Title 19, a state law that restricts the amount of chemicals a company can store before it has to add safety measures.

He said CPI's premises are monitored 24-hours a day and that trained employees watch over every delivery of dangerous chemicals. The company employs about 650 workers and Fickett said it has no plans to move anytime soon. And in his view, it would be unlawful for the city to force it to move.

Sorry, we don't buy it.

While CPI is in compliance with the zoning code by virtue of its grandfathered rights to continue what is known as a non-conforming use, the city has several ways to begin a process that would eventually require CPI to either shut down its plating operation or move it to another location. Three options were laid out in a staff report for the council and could be implemented regardless of whether CPI's use is now below Title 19 thresholds for hazardous materials.

The first, and in our view the most practical, is for the city to amend the zoning to prohibit plating shops or facilities using similar hazardous materials from being located within 300 feet of residential zones, and require current uses to cease after a reasonable period.

A study done for the city found that 20 years is a reasonable period for CPI to phase out its operations, with the clock starting in 2006, the year CPI made its most recent improvements at the Hansen Way site. That would give the company 14 years to phase out its use of toxic chemicals.

Other options would require that more details be disclosed about hazardous chemicals and their use near residential areas, while a third would not seek to modify zoning but would work with CPI and the neighbors to achieve voluntary reductions in the use of hazardous chemicals near the neighborhood.

The council is taking a cautious approach to the issue, but did move toward what we hope will be a solution, deciding to ask a consultant to reassess the definition of a hazardous facility like CPI. The consultant would compare the best ways to handle hazardous materials with practices currently in use by CPI and advise the council on possible risk levels that could assist in making a zoning change.

After this study is complete, the council gave itself six months to take action, a reasonable amount of time but still addressing the urgency expressed by the Barron Park homeowners. We hope that the plan laid out this week will finally bring a resolution to a problem that has been festering unnecessarily for six years or longer.

Today, no company using hazardous materials like CPI would be permitted to locate near a residential neighborhood. Now, it is the city's responsibility to remedy a situation that has gone on long enough.

Apologies for past problems and improved emergency procedures aren't enough. It is time for the city to begin the amortization process and for CPI to find another site for its plating operation. Residents should not be subjected to the risks that these substances could escape containment and threaten their homes and lives.

Comments

Posted by Freida Leigh, a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:22 pm

Barron Park was not developed after Varian. My family bought their home in Barron Park in 1942 .


Posted by Don't-Forget, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 28, 2012 at 8:38 pm

Barron Park was not officially a part of Palo Alto until 1976, when the Annexation was completed.


Posted by Tyler Hanley, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 29, 2012 at 10:26 am

The following comments were moved from a duplicate thread:

Posted by Douglas Moran, a resident of the Barron Park neighborhood, on April 28, 2012 at 3:27 a.m.
Douglas Moran is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online

"And while Barron Park was developed after Varian built its facility,..." (paragraph 3):

This is highly misleading. The issue of who moved in next to who is important factor because the false inference licensed gives has given rise to false assessments and arguments.

While the overall Barron Park neighborhood had significant development after Varian built its facility, the section closest to that facility was one of the earliest areas in BP to develop and already had substantial residential development by that time. The dates I have seen for the creation of the Stanford Research Park is 1951, with the Varian facility dated as 1953 or 1957.

According to a database compiled by Barron Park historian Douglas Graham, of the 73 current residential properties on the street (Chimalus) adjacent to the facility, 49 were already had homes built by 1950 (67%), with another 9 in 1951-52, and 6 in 1954-57 (cumulative 79% and 88% respectively).

One block over on Matadero (from El Camino to Laguna), there are 57 residential properties (excluding the apartments). 34 (60%) had houses by 1950; 41 (72%) by 1953, 48 (84%) by 1957.

The Varian/CPI HazMat operation moved in next to a well established residential neighborhood, both in the beginning of the SRP and when CPI greatly expanded it by moving in a operation previously located in an industrial park in San Carlos.

----------

Posted by Peter Carpenter, a resident of Atherton, 17 hours ago
Peter Carpenter is a member (registered user) of Palo Alto Online

Remember that even oxygen in high concentrations is very toxic, even fatal.

The issue is not toxicity but the manner in which a particular chemical entitiy is stored and processed.


Posted by susie, a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 29, 2012 at 1:12 pm

Its not just Barron Park. This whole place is toxic. There is dumping in the creeks, all of them> Stanford Labs put radioactive material down the drains. Over near 101 you are always within quarter of a mile of a superfund site. College Terrace IS on a superfund site - the old HP plant on S. California. Los Altos Hills is on its own fault line. The railway makes a huge noise as do 101, El Camino, Middlefield, Escondido, Pagemill, and San Antonio! And Cancer rates are very high here!


Posted by sotru, a resident of Southgate
on Apr 29, 2012 at 2:57 pm

finally, its noticed the entire area is TOXIC... mainly ,constant acrid industry odors ,always some kind of smoke smell or ''burning plastic'' kind of smell. too many apartment buildings that are literally chemical factories with the constant laundy soap fumes, artificial and toxic sickening. believe it or not, there are people who cannot function like a normal person because of so much toxic air in society. silicon valley no longer smells like blossoms in the evening. like it did 30 years ago. it s completely horrible acrid industry odors. rarely without SOME kind of smoke smell. crimes against the environment.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Indian street food and ... bitcoins?
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 2,848 views

. . . Loved in Spite of Ourselves
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,160 views

"The Galapagos Affair: Satan Came to Eden"
By Anita Felicelli | 0 comments | 1,005 views

I Spy
By Cheryl Bac | 4 comments | 862 views

The Cinderella ride
By Sally Torbey | 10 comments | 700 views