News

Palo Alto approves Stanford Hospital expansion

City Council members call decision one of the most important the city will have to make in years

Stanford University Medical Center's four-year quest to get Palo Alto's permission for a massive expansion of its facilities glided past the finish line Monday night when an enthusiastic City Council voted to approve what members routinely say is the largest development project in the city's history.

In a series of 8-0 votes (Councilman Larry Klein recused himself) that several members called the most important the council will make in many years, the council paved the way for Project Renewal -- a dramatic expansion of Stanford's hospital facilities that will add 1.3 million square feet of new development to the city.

The $5 billion project includes building a new Stanford Hospital & Clinics building, expanding the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and making various upgrades and renovations to Stanford School of Medicine buildings and clinics.

The tortuous approval process kicked off in 2007 and included 97 public hearings and more than two years of tense negotiations between the city and Stanford over a development agreement that would allow the hospitals for far exceed local zoning regulations. Though the city and Stanford initially clashed on a number of issues, including revenue guarantees, new housing and transportation impacts, the expansion project picked up momentum, along with the council's support, over the past year.

Councilman Greg Scharff said he was amazed by the way Stanford, the city and the greater community pulled together on the project. He praised the health care benefits Project Renewal will bring to the city. His colleagues agreed and backed Scharff's motion to grant the project environmental clearance.

"It's probably going to be the most important that we'll make as a City Council in a long time," Scharff said shortly before the 8-0 vote to approve the environmental-impact report. "I think this will benefit the community for generations."

Other council members shared his enthusiasm. Vice Mayor Yiaway Yeh called Monday's meeting a "momentous evening," and Councilman Pat Burt praised the dramatic change in tone in the negotiations between Stanford and the city, saying the discussions lay "an excellent foundation for future relationships." Councilwoman Gail Price said the project is "complex," "intense" and "forward thinking" and that she considered it a "pleasure to be a part of this process."

Councilman Greg Schmid put it most succinctly: "It's a night for celebration in Palo Alto."

More than 100 people, including a handful of past and present mayors, dozens of doctors and patients and one legendary San Francisco 49ers quarterback, packed into the Council Chambers at City Hall for the project's final public hearing. Their message to the council was clear and nearly unanimous.

"As a resident of Palo Alto, as someone who for generations now -- for my children and probably their children -- have been beneficiaries of this hospital, I urge you to approve this project tonight in a unanimous fashion," said former 49er Steve Young, a member of Stanford Hospital's board of directors, echoing the comments of almost every other speaker.

East Palo Alto Mayor Carlos Romero also voiced his city's support for Stanford's expansion. Though the East Palo Alto council had concerns about the project's traffic impacts, these concerns were assuaged by last-minute negotiations between East Palo Alto, Palo Alto and Stanford. The hospitals had agreed to provide $200,000 to the city for improvements to University Avenue.

Romero cited the Sunday morning shooting in East Palo Alto, in which an infant was killed and his parents wounded. Romero noted that the parents were taken to Stanford Hospital for treatment. The boy's mother was released today.

"Had the Stanford University hospital not been that close, indeed we may have lost another person," Romero said.

The council's votes pave the way for Stanford to launch the next phase, which hospital officials say will require an investment of about $5 billion over the next 30 years. The goal is to upgrade aging facilities, add beds to both the main and children's hospitals and seismically retrofit all the facilities to comply with state law.

The new Stanford Hospital would add 144 beds to its hospital for a total of 600. The Children's Hospital would raise its bed count from 257 to 361. Christopher Dawes, CEO of the Children's Hospital, told the council that these expansions are sorely needed given that both hospitals currently turn patients away because of insufficient capacity.

Both hospitals would also add a slew of patient-friendly amenities, including expanded, family-friendly rooms at the Children's Hospital and a "medicine garden" on the promenade of the new Stanford Hospital. The design of both hospitals had already been endorsed by the city's Architectural Review Board, which held 29 public hearings on the various elements of the expansion project.

The city's Planning and Transportation Commission also backed the project last month over a series of unanimous or nearly unanimous votes.

Commissioner Eduardo Martinez said the planning commission has some concerns about the expansion, including the potential impact of 2,000 new workers on local housing and the Palo Alto Unified School District. Commissioners also suggested that Stanford create a historic-restoration fund to compensate for the proposed demolition of the hospital's "Stone Building," which was designed in 1956 by Edward Durell Stone.

Despite these reservations, the commission unanimously backed the project and recommended approving all the environmental documents and the proposed development agreement between Stanford and the city. The commission also approved changing the city's Comprehensive Plan to create a new "Hospital District" tailored to the needs of the new facilities.

"Stanford Hospital is like nothing else in our city and it makes great sense for there to be a district that deals with the kind of construction that is completely tied to the programs that it houses," Martinez said. "There's a lot of exceptions to the way we build for a hospital project that a Hospital District ... will address."

The environmental study for the project identified 41 "significant" impacts of the project, all but 12 of which could be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. But the project would still increase traffic congestion at several Menlo Park intersections, burden the immediate area with air pollution and require removal of 62 trees. The report also notes that some impacts, including air pollution and noise during construction, cannot be fully mitigated.

Stanford has offered Palo Alto an expansive package of benefits and mitigations to offset these impacts and compensate the city for allowing it to exceed zoning regulations. The hospitals plan to but Caltrain Go Passes for all hospital workers and provide $7 million in health care programs, $12 million for climate-change programs; $3.4 million for pedestrian and bicycle connections; $23.2 million for housing programs and infrastructure; and an upfront payment of $2.4 million.

Stanford has also guaranteed the city as much as $8.1 million in construction-tax revenue to offset any fiscal impact the expanded hospitals would have on the city's budget.

Mayor Sid Espinosa said called Stanford's proposal a "vision for world-class health care" and said he hopes the project will bring the city and Stanford closer together.

"As we move forward with this project, on behalf of the city, we really look forward to a different era of partnership and collaborations with hospitals and the university as a whole," Espinosa said.

Watch an animated 'flythrough' of the expanded Stanford Hospital.

Comments

Posted by What a City, a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Jun 6, 2011 at 11:25 pm

Well I'm glad the City was able to milk 23.2 Million out of Stanford for various Healthcare programs while at the same time the City is reducing health care for their own employees and retirees.

Lot of give aways here. Glad everyone is so happy.


Posted by Howard, a resident of Crescent Park
on Jun 7, 2011 at 6:48 am

The location of the old hospital was a ridiculous location, requiring you to wend your way from 101 down University, through downtown and the campus, and then through the shopping center. Using the same location for the new hospital is an order of magnitude more ridiculous. Traffic will be a nighmare. Oh, and by the way, the water demand for the expanded facility will be such as to require all of Palo Alto to engage in water rationing. Let's see how loud the brainless cheerleaders for the expansion cheer when that goes into effect.


Posted by svatoid, a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Jun 7, 2011 at 8:45 am

svatoid is a registered user.

"The location of the old hospital was a ridiculous location, requiring you to wend your way from 101 down University, through downtown and the campus, and then through the shopping center."

Is that the only way to get to the hospital. A gross exaggeration if there ever was one.

"Let's see how loud the brainless cheerleaders for the expansion cheer when that goes into effect."
As we see when some people do not get their way, they resort to name calling of those that supported this long overdue project.

Perhaps Howard can get together with certain former councilmembers to mourn the vote.


Posted by workthere, a resident of Menlo Park
on Jun 7, 2011 at 9:14 am

Howard has a point. In less than a week Stanford will no longer be running a bus service during the weekends. The old VTA 86 used to serve the front of the hospital throughout the year, and the VTA 35, the back, if I'm not mistaken. But now, and for quite a few years, if it's summer and the weekend you can only get in as far as Arboretum Road, that is, between the main Shopping Center and Crate and Barrel. I would have thought that between them Stanford and VTA could have done a better job of providing access all year long, but that has not happened.


Posted by notanymore, a resident of Palo Verde
on Jun 7, 2011 at 9:24 am

bus 35 doe not service to this location any more,mind you.


Posted by workthere, a resident of Menlo Park
on Jun 7, 2011 at 9:30 am

Yes, notanymore, that's what I said. "used to serve" = past tense.


Posted by former resident, a resident of another community
on Jun 7, 2011 at 3:49 pm

Congratulations to the excellent efforts of so many to bring this important improvement to the town of Palo Alto. It is always easier to see the glass half empty and find the flaws in any change that comes to a community. This project is filled with challenges which took years to discuss trying to meet the needs of both sides of the town and gown teams. Dispite the many problems this is an amazing opportunity for good growth that provides exceptional health care to the residents. WELL DONE city manger, city council and Stanford leadership!!


Posted by Crabby, a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on Jun 8, 2011 at 10:40 am

Hey, great idea!

The roads are already jammed and you can't park downtown, near California Cafe or near University!

$2 million isn't going to cover the lost sales tax revenue.


Posted by Factoid alert, a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 8, 2011 at 9:05 pm

Check your facts, crabby. They say the garages in downtown palo alto are undErused. Sounds like more of the anti-Stanford hysteria that is fueled by exaggerations, lies, and factoids


Posted by neighbor, a resident of another community
on Jun 9, 2011 at 10:23 am

This is over, but it will linger on these pages as Paloaltoonline tries to whip up at least a little frenzy and acrimony in the community.

I repeat: It's over, and the hospital project will go forward at last. Congrats to all responsible for getting this project back on track.


Posted by workthere, a resident of Menlo Park
on Jun 9, 2011 at 11:59 am

With friends like this, who needs enemies? Stanford seems to have all these people just waiting in the wings. Since when did my a.m. become so defensive, I wonder? The other thing I wonder about is what this hospital will look like in the world that it's going to be part of.


Posted by view101, a resident of Palo Alto Orchards
on Jun 9, 2011 at 5:41 pm

The new hospital buildings look beautiful.

But the traffic issues still worry me. Stanford needs to do more to address the pending traffic standstills. The deals with Menlo Park and Palo Alto appear to be fixed cost based upon predicted traffic patterns and not a function of the actual traffic patterns. That should be addressed.

At least 50% of cars are from out of town.

Long ago Stanford built the trains and railroad tracks.
They need to get back into that business and get BART
extended from Millbrae to Union City to complete the loop.

They also need to redo the PA train station and make it modern and electric. Perhaps a highrise with a hotel.

That would be the perfect gateway to Stanford, not the diesel 1940s train terminal we have now.

But to had out millions on Caltrains passes is a reactionary action
and not visionary and planning for the future when dependence on oil is drastically reduced, issues of green house gases dominate and traffic has come to stand still in PA at some portions of the day.

Stanford has all the technical know how, all the industrial connections to get it done.

And they should doit especially since they are mostly tax-exempt and the cost of the project would roughly equal the taxes they would pay if they were a for profit corporation.





Posted by DF7, a resident of Downtown North
on Jul 19, 2012 at 2:53 am

view101, the problems of traffic cannot be fully mitigated by building more roads and parking structures. The density of the peninsula is reaching the point that a greater emphasis on public transportation is necessary, hence why Stanford is handing out Caltrain passes (Caltrain needs all the financial help it can get right now anyway).

It is also not the university's responsibility to improve public transportation infrastructure. Why in the world would it be? If you don't like the way that BART/Caltrain are coordinated, then talk to the counties/state. Don't blame Stanford for our legislators' lack of insight.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The dress code
By Jessica T | 21 comments | 1,880 views

September food and drink goings on
By Elena Kadvany | 0 comments | 1,282 views

. . . People will never forget how you made them feel.
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,249 views

Two Days to Save This Dog?
By Cathy Kirkman | 15 comments | 1,235 views

It Depends... Disguising Real Characters in Fiction
By Nick Taylor | 0 comments | 401 views