Stanford offers to admit 7 percent of applicants

Percentage of students who accept is second only to Harvard University

Stanford University today sent e-mails to 1,673 high school students from "around the world," inviting them to join the undergraduate Class of 2015, the university announced.

This story contains 251 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

— Palo Alto Weekly staff


Like this comment
Posted by Curious
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 30, 2011 at 11:17 am

I am curious how these numbers compare to previous years. Is 7% of applicants a normal acceptance rate? Did they receive more applications than usual? Over time, how have these numbers changed? It would be more useful to present these numbers in a context.

Like this comment
Posted by Paul
a resident of Crescent Park
on Mar 30, 2011 at 11:25 am

Curious: check out the last line of the story. 7.2% last year. Not a LOT of context, but something...

Like this comment
Posted by local
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 30, 2011 at 1:39 pm

May take a bunch off their waitlist. So many kids are putting out so many apps now and they can only attend one university, hence the waitlist situation nowadays.

Like this comment
Posted by Sarah
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Mar 30, 2011 at 6:30 pm

Not saying this happens at Stanford, or other highly selective universities, but in "some" less selective colleges, they have boosted their national rankings considerably in the last few years by simply not "accepting" as many qualified applicants and dropping them down to "waitlist" status. It changes the college's yield, making it appear more desirable and more competitive. In turn, it attracts a stronger applicant pool the next year, trending its scores upwards etc.--even if the highly qualified only applied to it as an additional back-up school, it worked to gain stronger applicants.

Though the more qualified applicant will still more than likely select the more prestigious institution if accepted, a few will arrive on their campus--maybe for financial aid purposes, honor student placement, etc. Regardless, the university has successfully elevated its rank and popularity by making this adjustment. Their waitlist, now deep and strong, is loaded with overly anxious applicants just waiting for a last-minute reprieve. Clever strategy--misleading, but clever.

This change, along with extraordinary large pool of students applying to college, has definitely narrowed the playing field on acceptances for our kids. Hopefully, we can de-emphasize the rankings and simply celebrate the victory of attending college at all.

Like this comment
Posted by Curious
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Mar 30, 2011 at 10:26 pm

Curious - do you know of anyone who has ever applied overseas to a university, like Oxford or University of London (for undergrad, not for grad or Rhodes Scholarship? Many foreign students apply here and I never hear of anyone pursuing undergrad studies overseas.

Like this comment
Posted by Rick
a resident of Stanford
on Mar 31, 2011 at 1:53 am

The acceptance rate is simply a matter of how many applications are received. Stanford enrolls about 1600-1700 each year. From previous years they know what percentage of admits will turn down their offer, so they estimate how many they need to admit to end up at 1600-1700. They usually waitlist over 1000. Few on the waitlist will end up being admitted. Most are waitlisted for diplomatic reasons - they are legacies, parents donated lots of money, older sibling is a current student, graduating from one of their feeder prep schools, etc. Let's them save face by telling their classmates they are still being considered until summer when no one cares any longer.

Like this comment
Posted by Emma
a resident of Charleston Meadows
on Apr 1, 2011 at 11:38 am

Sarah, I am pretty sure every university wants to uptick its academic ranking. So don't blame "some" universities which have successfully implement ways to achieve it. In fact, no one is prohibiting the same methods to be used by anyone. Only the real good universities stand out from the competition.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Sam's Chowder House Palo Alto to become burger chain
By Elena Kadvany | 25 comments | 11,606 views

Family Planning: Don't F%@K Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,373 views

Sing and celebrate
By Sally Torbey | 7 comments | 519 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 23 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $4 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.