A historic church in downtown Palo Alto will be preserved, renovated and transformed into an office building under a plan approved by the City Council Monday night.
In 2008, the company ECI Three Bryant, LLC, purchased the building with the intention of preserving and upgrading the building, which is considered one of the area's best examples of Mission Revival architectural style.
On Monday, the council unanimously endorsed the company's plan to preserve the building and to create office space on the ground floor. The council also granted the applicant the right to develop more than 5,000 square feet at a different site, as part an incentive to preserve the historic features of the structure.
The project was prompted by the city's policy of giving development "bonuses" to builders who preserve historic structures.
Vice Mayor Sid Espinosa said Monday night that this is exactly the kind of project the policy was meant to encourage.
"This project has been given a lot of thought by the city," Espinosa said. "Thank goodness we have these sorts of ordinances to protect these properties and to rehabilitate them."
The proposal also includes a new handicap ramp and replacement of the tinted glass in 22 of the church's windows. The "historic opalescent glass" at five other windows would also be replaced and new landscaping installed.
Councilman Larry Klein called the proposed renovation a "superb project," one that would make a "great contribution to our community." The city's Historic Resources Board had also unanimously approved the project, though it added more than 20 conditions of approval.
David Bower, chair of the board, said members felt strongly that the proposal both meets the needs of the city and offers the developer enough incentives to make the project viable. Bower noted that the building hasn't received any significant architectural changes since its construction.
"In the 94 years it's been here it's almost unchanged," Bower said. "It's pretty unique in terms of historic architecture in this city."
The commission's conditions pertained mostly to preserving historic components of the building, including its tinted glass, its exterior lighting fixtures and its large doors.
The council's only disagreement was over whether the city should inspect the project every three years to make sure the applicant is complying with all the conditions. But the proposal by council members Karen Holman and Greg Scharff to mandate the regular inspections failed to convince the rest of the council, who voted it down 2-6 (with Nancy Shepherd recusing herself).
The council also required the applicant to provide a marker on the site identifying the historic building and referring to its protected status.
This story contains 474 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.