News

Palo Alto schools: growth, budget cuts in 2010

Kickoff of 'Springboard to Kindergarten' gives year a happy start

Palo Alto schools will open the new year with a fresh dose of childish enthusiasm.

Springboard to Kindergarten, a "crash course in kindergarten readiness," will be launched in January.

Springboard is one bright spot in a new year otherwise dominated by school-budget uncertainty.

With rising enrollment and shrinking revenues, cuts will be necessary even if voters this spring renew and boost the parcel tax that provides 6 percent of the district's operating budget, school leaders say.

Palo Alto's 17 schools are seeking ways to bridge an anticipated $5.1 million "structural deficit" in the district's $154 million operating budget for 2010-11.

"It's a challenge to shrink the budget knowing that 85 percent of it is your staff," school board member Camille Townsend said this week.

"The strength of our program is in our staff."

The school district is seeking the public's budget-cutting suggestions by e-mail at balancedbudget@pausd.org. Officials will gather the ideas for a school-board study session to be scheduled early in the year.

Schools already have saved more than $2 million through an informal hiring freeze, a slight increase in class sizes, swimming-pool closures and reduced food budgets.

Palo Alto does not get additional state revenue even if enrollment goes up because it is funded under the "basic aid" formula, which is based on property taxes.

The district educates 11,565 students in 12 elementary schools, three middle schools, two high schools plus alternative high-school programs and a school at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital.

In December, Gunn and Palo Alto high schools both earned ranking on U.S. News & World Report's list of "top 100" public high schools as measured by student participation and performance on Advanced Placement tests.

Even with the cuts, renewal of the district's parcel tax this spring is critical if Palo Alto is to continue offering the high-quality program for which it is known, school officials said.

The current $493-a-year-per-parcel levy generates $9.4 million a year, about 6 percent of the district's operating budget. It expires in 2011.

Superintendent Kevin Skelly has asked to replace the current tax with a $589-a-year-per-parcel levy, which would need voters' approval in a May election. The new tax would have a six-year life span and carry an optional exemption for seniors as well as a 2 percent per year growth adjustment to keep up with enrollment growth and cost increases.

Even with passage of the parcel tax, "We're probably going to have to make some choices that are really tough, that we don't want to have to make," school board member Melissa Baten Caswell said in a December meeting.

Amid the budget concerns, the school board last year backed off on a plan to refurbish and reopen the former Garland Elementary School campus, at 870 N. California Ave., as the district's 13th elementary school.

Officials are keeping a nervous eye on enrollment as they significantly renovate the other campuses for expected growth. Funds for that major construction come from the Measure A "Strong Schools for a Strong Community" $378 million bond measure backed by 78 percent of voters in June 2008.

The funds already have paid for major new building at Gunn, and district families will see much more evidence of construction on every campus over the next 10 years.

The new Springboard to Kindergarten starts later this month, when families begin registering their children for kindergarten in September.

At the time of registration, the foundation-funded, trial program will identify 40 children who lack a solid pre-K foundation.

The 40 will be enrolled immediately in a five-day-a-week pre-school running from February until August, when they actually start kindergarten. Activities will stress social-emotional skill-building, the kind of skills Palo Alto school officials view as key to kindergarten success.

Officials hope "Springboard" will prove to be a cost-effective way to narrow the achievement gap -- that the crash course will give kids a jumpstart and help to avert the need for costly remedial help in later grades.

"I really hope for these kids that this is it -- they will be able to be where everyone else is. They won't need all this intervention later," said Sharon Keplinger, director of the school district's popular Young Fives program.

Keplinger also will oversee Springboard to Kindergarten. Both programs are at Greendell School.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mike D
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 1, 2010 at 6:35 pm

They keep on building more and more cookie cutter condos in midtown and near mt. view, with a new large development in the works again, from what I understand. Why do we need more people here? Traffic is already horrendous, parking impossible, and schools jam-packed.The end result is that this community will be downgraded along with its schools.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Daniel Mart
a resident of Mountain View
on Jan 3, 2010 at 1:52 pm

Daniel Mart is a registered user.

Blame a status quo that favors rich people ... there is so much special-interest mone involved in hotel and housing developments; this fact alone protects the developers from any public protest. And then we have city governments too cowardly to challenge this broken status quo.

It is an extreme form of institutionalized discrimination. Take the Palo Alto Bowl issue, for example; so many disabled people will be negatively affected, including Special Olympics (used the alley to train), disabilty programs in Palo Alto Rec, local hospitals, and every special ed/APE program in the PAUSD.

And many of these bowlers are unable to go to other cities for the very few authentic alleys which still remain. And the new bowling clubs, with their lights and such, are not accessible ... example: not good for individuals prone to seizures.

And Barry Swenson cashes in.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by pecuniac
a resident of Midtown
on Jan 4, 2010 at 11:24 am

When will the City Council get that in lieu fees paid by developers never pay for the additional infrastructure and services (police, fire, schools) that additional residents require?

And does it make sense to locate housing right on busy, polluted roads like El Camino Real or US101?

And what is the purpose of city planning? Is it a plan to get a job with a developer in a revolving door system similar to the defense industry?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of University South
on Jan 4, 2010 at 4:56 pm

Didn't we just vote in more property tax money for schools?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Chris Kenrick, Palo Alto Weekly staff
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Jan 4, 2010 at 7:27 pm

Mike,

The last time there was a property tax election for Palo Alto schools was June 7, 2005, when 74 percent of voters approved the current $493-per-parcel tax. That tax expires next year and Superintendent Kevin Skelly is recommending it be replaced with the new proposal. The parcel tax generates about 6 percent of the district's operating budget.

You may be confusing it with a June 2008 election in which 77.59 percent of PAUSD voters approved a $378 million bond measure for school construction and renovation. These funds will cover new building and upgrades of all PAUSD campuses over the next decade or so. More information on the bond program is at Web Link.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of University South
on Jan 5, 2010 at 1:42 pm

Chris,

Thanks for clearing this up!

Mike


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Steven
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Jan 5, 2010 at 3:06 pm

All those new housing developments bring in lots of new property tax money; more than enough to pay for the schools and other services that the residents use. The problem is all the people who are paying less than their share of property tax because their houses are not assessed at fair market value.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Jan 7, 2010 at 10:40 am

Seems that we should be looking at the State of Texas for some answers to our budget problems. They have close to the same demographics as California yet there students are better educated at a lower funding level. You can read more here Web Link


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 3,635 views

Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
By Douglas Moran | 13 comments | 1,552 views

A Surprise!
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 1,447 views

Marriage Underachievers
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,396 views

It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 681 views