News

Pre-election buzz
about the 'I' word

What candidates say about Palo Alto's infrastructure dilemma

Nebulous yet necessary, that squiggly catch-all known as "infrastructure" is the election season's hot topic.

It's on the lips of every Palo Alto City Council candidate and on the minds of many voters. Although it sounds daunting, infrastructure is just a fancy word for streets and sidewalks, buildings, storm drains, light poles, bridges, pipes and just about everything else that keeps Palo Alto running.

It's complex, costly and critical.

And when candidates and citizens weigh in, citing figures and anecdotes, infrastructure can become downright confusing.

For an added twist, in this election "infrastructure" also refers to the need for a new Mitchell Park Library and Community Center, an expanded Main Library and system-wide library improvements, and it also means a new police and emergency-command headquarters, also called a "public-safety building."

These projects have been discussed for years and already have preliminary designs, but depend on $95 million of bonds, which require two-thirds of voters' approval. And according to a recent survey and a 21-voter focus group held in August, the passage of the bonds, proposed for a 2008 ballot, is doubtful. A February survey found that 57 percent support the public-safety building bond and 65 percent are in favor of the libraries bond. It might take a year to 18 months for the city to build support among voters, many of whom are dubious or even cynical about the city's ability to perform, the consultants reported.

To help voters pick the best persons for the job in the Nov. 6 election, here's a brief review of the city's recent infrastructure efforts and a look at what the 11 City Council candidates have to say about the "I" word.

In 2000, Palo Alto launched an Infrastructure Management Plan, also called CityWorks, based on a mid-1990s survey of all city facilities and property, the Adamson Report. The report detailed a $100 million backlog of needs, not including schools or non-critical improvements.

That report is being updated, and some officials believe the new total for infrastructure maintenance and replacement could be as high as $200 million, according to Councilman Bern Beecham -- one of the four members vacating a council seat this year.

By March 2007, the city had spent $53 million on non-utilities deficiencies listed in the report, according to Assistant Public Works Director Mike Sartor.

Including utilities, the city plans to spend another $50 to $60 million on infrastructure maintenance and upgrades between July 2007 and July 2008.

About $41 million will go to utilities maintenance and upgrades. For that, Palo Alto will have a rebuilt underground electric-distribution system along El Camino Real, a relocated Alma Street substation, converted overhead electrical lines to underground, progress on an emergency water-supply project, additional gas-main replacements, a new storm-water pump station and more.

The balance includes $3 million for streets, $1.6 million for sidewalks and a variety of other projects: $100,000 for roofs, $400,000 for Greer Park and $130,000 for resurfacing tennis and basketball courts.

The street funding includes an annual increase of $250,000 to keep up with an extensive street-repair backlog -- potholes are one of the most frequent voter gripes in the campaign. Twenty-two miles of roadway will be treated or coated this year, while six "lane miles" will be repaved, according to Senior Engineer Elizabeth Ames of the Public Works Department. The city also acquired a $680,000 state grant to develop a bike boulevard along Maybell Avenue.

Despite the catch-up push, more improvements are needed, nearly everyone agrees.

Most critical, according to current council members, is the $45 million upgrade and expansion of the libraries and a new $50 million public-safety building.

Given the state of the city's infrastructure and financing needs, campaigning council candidates are hoping to win voter favor through their views on how to tackle the dilemma, in particular the bonds.

Dan Dykwel said he still supports placing one or both bond measures on a 2008 ballot. The 21-voter focus group isn't representative of the community, he said, noting that he has heard from many people who support the libraries and public-safety projects.

"I'm trying to make people aware of the real details so they can make decisions based on the real facts," Dykwel said.

Victor Frost has said he supports the library and public-safety bonds.

Bill Ross has said he would like to investigate using certificates of participation -- which would likely require the city to lease its new facilities -- to pay for the public-safety and library improvements. Ross said he would also explore dedicating future increases in property-tax revenues to library operations.

Sid Espinosa said Palo Altans need to draw on creativity, explore private/public partnerships and conduct an educational campaign to finance infrastructure and gain support for the public-safety and library bonds.

A key responsibility of the next council is to prioritize its spending and ensure voters understand what is needed, Espinosa said.

Pat Burt said he thought the focus group accurately captured some voters' sense of distrust of the city.

City leaders need to "aggressively" demonstrate accountability and openness to gain public confidence before they can pursue the financing measures, Burt said.

"You can't just go forward and simply put them on and think they're going to pass without addressing the perception that was shown in the focus groups," he said.

Greg Schmid said the bond issues are very important and should have been done five to 10 years ago.

"I think with strong leadership, with the City Council going out to the community and explaining the importance of both the library and the public-safety building, I think we can achieve the necessary vote to pass it," Schmid said.

Mark Nadim said he believes creative outreach is needed to inform the public about the library and public-safety needs.

He said he supports raising private funds to offset the cost of the bonds and then spending the next year educating the public before the November 2008 election.

Smokey Wallace would like to increase infrastructure spending on issues such as roads, but he doesn't support the library or public-safety bonds.

Both the libraries and the Police Department need to be reorganized before additional money is sought from the voters, Wallace said.

Tim Gray said the city needs to demonstrate its financial responsibility to the public before trying to convince the public of the need for the bond measures.

"All the support that's voiced for infrastructure isn't going to do any good if we can't get citizen cooperation," Gray said.

He said the city needs to make "budget clarification" an emergency priority and then advocate for the bonds.

Yiaway Yeh said he supports both bonds but believes the library measure is "riper" in terms of voter support.

"In the end, this is still a vote to the people. That means you can't rush it," Yeh said.

It would be up to the council to take a leadership position to involve citizens, he said.

"This is an opportunity for us to work together toward something that we can be proud of."

Stella Marinos has said she needs to do more research to form a position on the public-safety or library bonds.

  • The candidates

  • How they'll vote

  • Election 2007

  • Comments

     +   Like this comment
    Posted by Resident
    a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
    on Oct 10, 2007 at 12:05 pm

    I still say it is no coincidence that one of the most important cross town arteries (Middlefield) is being dug up just before the election to make it look like the City is doing something about its "Infrastructure"

    Nice piece Weekly.


     +   Like this comment
    Posted by Becky's cool
    a resident of Evergreen Park
    on Oct 10, 2007 at 3:01 pm

    Becky Trout is a first rate reporter.


     +   Like this comment
    Posted by Vivian
    a resident of Midtown
    on Oct 10, 2007 at 6:37 pm

    Interesting that Jack Morton claims he is tired of the "i" word being bandied about. His solutions to solving the infrastructure problems--cutting or services or increasing city revenue.
    So what is Mr Morton doing about either solution? Nothing. He is just playing city council member while our mayor ignores everything. Maybe he is bitter because he got passed over for vice mayor position even though he had seniority on the council.


     +   Like this comment
    Posted by Becky
    a resident of Midtown
    on Oct 10, 2007 at 7:35 pm

    Passing over Jack Morton for Vice Mayor is the smartest thing this City Council ever did. He's turned the "I" word into a dirty word!!! But, we still need our "infrastructure" fixed Mr. Morton.


     +   Like this comment
    Posted by Michelle
    a resident of Community Center
    on Oct 15, 2007 at 9:34 am

    I just saw the Daily's endorsements for City Council - Burt, Espinosa, Yeh, and Schmid.

    This really surprised me, because Schmid is simply not very well informed on current issues; I've watched him in forums.

    We should stay with the Weekly's choices:
    DYKWEL, Yeh, Espinosa, and Burt


     +   Like this comment
    Posted by Carol Mullen
    a resident of Old Palo Alto
    on Oct 19, 2007 at 9:55 am

    That the candidates are informed at all is due more to the Weekly than to any openness on the part of our City Government. That's where we all get our information, unless a few dedicated people like Bob Moss and Tom Jordan do their own digging.

    I think these candidates are probably all pleasant, agreeable people. That isn't going to be enough to restore confidence in City government.

    These new councilmembers would have to change the longstanding pattern of unquestioning support of the City Manager. They've lost credibility with enough of us to make each bond election a gamble.

    Telling people who've watched the expensive blunders what a wonderful city government we have just makes elections seem irrelevant.

    Unless the new Council restores confidence in the City government, passing any bond is going to take a lot of luck, more luck than presentation.


     +   Like this comment
    Posted by Tim Gray
    a resident of Charleston Meadows
    on Oct 26, 2007 at 12:03 am

    Hi,

    This is Tim Gray, candidate for Palo Alto City Council. Take a look at my web site: Web Link .

    A little humility, and and a little demonstration of financial accountability will go a long way in restoring the trust. The idea that we can "market" or "time" the new financing to change community "perception" is naive.

    We must acknowledge that the "king has no clothes". It is a little trite, but "If you want to make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make the change." With openess, and dropping all defensiveness, we can find the financially responsible path to new libraries and a public safety building.

    Let's keep it real and step it up a notch. With a little financial discipline, we can unite and walk there together.

    Offered in the spirit of cooperation,

    Tim Gray www.vote4gray.com


    Don't miss out on the discussion!
    Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

    Email:


    Post a comment

    Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

    We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

    Name: *

    Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

    Comment: *

    Verification code: *
    Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

    *Required Fields

    Local picks on 2015 Michelin Bib Gourmand list
    By Elena Kadvany | 6 comments | 3,409 views

    Ode to Brussels Sprout
    By Laura Stec | 20 comments | 2,609 views

    Go Giants! Next Stop: World Series!
    By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,936 views

    Politics: Empty appeals to "innovation"
    By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 1,336 views

    It's Dog-O-Ween this Saturday!
    By Cathy Kirkman | 2 comments | 350 views