Local Blogs

Nose Under the Community Tent

By Paul Losch

E-mail Paul Losch

About this blog: I was a "corporate brat" growing up and lived in different parts of the country, ending in Houston, Texas for high school. After attending college at UC Davis, and getting an MBA at Harvard, I embarked on a marketing career, mai...  (More)

View all posts from Paul Losch

Re-Organizing How the City of Palo Alto Works

Uploaded: Oct 29, 2011

I am for Measure D, I oppose Measure E. Just so readers know, and do not have to ask. And not the point of my observations here.

However you come down on these two Measures, it is good to have us voters deciding if the laws and labor practices that have been on the books for years are in need of change.

Those of us who have worked in the private sector have experienced "re-organizations." Private companies by their nature must adapt on a regular basis, or they do not thrive. Our public sector organizations, from federal to local, are there to offer stable platforms for our general community and our private sector to ideally thrive in. Too often, the public sector entities have difficulty adapting, for reasons too numerous for me to mention in this brief post, and that can impede the public sector's basic role in supporting the community and the private sector.

Change is difficult. Human nature in general does not embrace, rather, it resists it. There is so much cacophony about public sector change and resistance to same. Arguments and assertions to which I have been exposed suggest huge disingenuity in polemics from parties taking opposite views on various issues. Hard for me to believe any of them.

I find this to be the case with Measures D and E. Eloquent and not so eloquent (usually emotional) assertions by advocates and opponents of each side.

What is good is that we Palo Alto citizens are being asked "is it time to change some arrangements that made sense when they first put into place some years ago, or should we stick with what we have in place?"
Each of us has to answer for ourselves such a question around Measures D and E. I think the question needs to be asked a great deal more around many issues. City staff and City Council can and do address this question as part of their regular duties. The question can be asked about many things here in town that require a vote of the citizenry, and we do not do it enough.

Comments

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Chuck, a resident of ,
on Oct 29, 2011 at 2:29 pm

"The question can be asked about many things here in town that require a vote of the citizenry"

Paul,

I understand your general point, I think. However, can you be a bit more specific? Please give us some examples of major issues that need to be directly voted on (besides D and E). Another way of saying this is: Our City Council is supposed to vote on our behalf, because we are not a direct democracy, but a representative democracy. If we don't like how our City Council votes, then we vote them out on election day.

Bottom line, Paul: Aren't you really saying that our City Council can't stand the heat in the kitchen? Or are you saying that we, as a citizenry, have locked ourselves into policies, through the general vote, that now require a reversal vote?


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Paul Losch, a resident of ,
on Oct 30, 2011 at 1:19 am

Paul Losch is a registered user.

Hi Chuck,

Thanks for some good questions.

I tend to favor government at the local level, it gets uglier up the proverbial "food chain" and definitely more confusing. Although there are circumstances and instutions that work better at a state or national level.

I do not favor the proposition model we have in the State of California. It may have had its place 100+ years ago, but has been out of control since Prop 13 in 1978. Voters are not necessarily better informed and able to make wise decisons compared to those they elect to work on these matters.

The irony in my comment is that I cannot include those along the Potomac, that is toxic water they drink there.

That said, here in Palo Alto, there are things that the voters/citizenry must vote on. I prefer it be done by our City Council when possible, and there are things that Council has to refer to the voter/citizens in town.

Some of those things should not have been established in such a way that requires a vote from the voters/citizens. But, I am glad that we are able to locally make choices that address choices made years ago under different circumstances.



Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:

Follow this blogger (Receive an email when blogger makes a new post)

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Cho's, beloved dim sum spot, to reopen in Los Altos
By Elena Kadvany | 8 comments | 5,719 views

Why I Became Active in Palo Alto Forward
By Steve Levy | 12 comments | 2,205 views

Early Decision Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 1,730 views

Guest Post from HSSV: Adopt a Naughty Dog!
By Cathy Kirkman | 1 comment | 1,432 views

First Interview
By Sally Torbey | 6 comments | 875 views